OBJECTIVES: To compare the transporter expression and signal profile on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhotic liver induced in rats, and investigate the correlation of the transporter expression and fibrosis rate in both diseases. METHODS: Forty-eight rats were divided into four groups of 12: TAA (cirrhosis), NASH 7- and 10-week, and control groups. Each group was divided into two subgroups: Group 1 for MRI and Group 2 for transporter examinations. RESULTS: The relative enhancement of the TAA group was significantly lower than those of other groups (p < 0.01). The T(max) and T(1/2) of the NASH 10-week group was significantly prolonged in comparison with the TAA group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the oatp1 expression, whereas the mrp2 expression of the TAA group was significantly higher than those of other groups (p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the fibrosis rate and oatp1 expression, whereas a paradoxical correlation was found between the fibrosis rate and mrp2 expression (NASH: negative correlation, r = 0.91, p < 0.01; TAA: positive correlation, r = 0.85, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the mrp2 expression in cirrhosis increases in comparison with NASH, and there was a paradoxical correlation between the fibrosis rate and mrp2 expression.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the transporter expression and signal profile on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhotic liver induced in rats, and investigate the correlation of the transporter expression and fibrosis rate in both diseases. METHODS: Forty-eight rats were divided into four groups of 12: TAA (cirrhosis), NASH 7- and 10-week, and control groups. Each group was divided into two subgroups: Group 1 for MRI and Group 2 for transporter examinations. RESULTS: The relative enhancement of the TAA group was significantly lower than those of other groups (p < 0.01). The T(max) and T(1/2) of the NASH 10-week group was significantly prolonged in comparison with the TAA group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the oatp1 expression, whereas the mrp2 expression of the TAA group was significantly higher than those of other groups (p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the fibrosis rate and oatp1 expression, whereas a paradoxical correlation was found between the fibrosis rate and mrp2 expression (NASH: negative correlation, r = 0.91, p < 0.01; TAA: positive correlation, r = 0.85, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the mrp2 expression in cirrhosis increases in comparison with NASH, and there was a paradoxical correlation between the fibrosis rate and mrp2 expression.
Authors: J E van Montfoort; B Stieger; D K Meijer; H J Weinmann; P J Meier; K E Fattinger Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Craig D Fisher; Andrew J Lickteig; Lisa M Augustine; Ronald P J Oude Elferink; David G Besselsen; Robert P Erickson; Nathan J Cherrington Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: L Pascolo; F Cupelli; P L Anelli; V Lorusso; M Visigalli; F Uggeri; C Tiribelli Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1999-04-21 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Andrew J Lickteig; Craig D Fisher; Lisa M Augustine; Lauren M Aleksunes; David G Besselsen; Angela L Slitt; Jose E Manautou; Nathan J Cherrington Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2007-07-19 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Simon Matoori; Johannes M Froehlich; Stefan Breitenstein; Aleksis Doert; Viktoria Pozdniakova; Dow-Mu Koh; Andreas Gutzeit Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yan-Yan Zhang; Chao-Xu Zhang; Yu Li; Xuan Jiang; Yong-Fang Wang; Yang Sun; Jun Wang; Wan-Ying Ji; Yi Liu Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Anastassia Karageorgis; Stephen C Lenhard; Brittany Yerby; Mikael F Forsgren; Serguei Liachenko; Edvin Johansson; Mark A Pilling; Richard A Peterson; Xi Yang; Dominic P Williams; Sharon E Ungersma; Ryan E Morgan; Kim L R Brouwer; Beat M Jucker; Paul D Hockings Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240