BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of a 7-day pre-coded food record (PFR) method in 9-month-old infants against metabolizable energy intake (ME(DLW)) measured by doubly labeled water (DLW); additionally to compare PFR with a 7-day weighed food record (WFR) in 9-month-old infants and 36-month-old children. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: The study population consisted of 36 infants (age: 9.03±0.2 months) and 36 young children (age: 36.1±0.3 months) enrolled in a cross-over design of 7 consecutive days PFR vs 7 consecutive days WFR. Children were randomly assigned to one method during week 1, crossing over to the alternative method in week 2. Total energy expenditure (TEE) and ME(DLW) were obtained in the 9-month-old infants using the DLW technique for 7 days while recording with PFR. RESULTS: For the 9-month-old group, PFR showed a mean bias of +726 kJ/day, equivalent to 24%, (P<0.0001) compared with ME(DLW) (n=29). Using WFR as the reference in this group no between-method differences were found for energy, fat and carbohydrate. Energy intake in the 36-month-old children was 12% higher in the PFR vs WFR (P<0.0001), and protein plus total fat intake were overestimated with the PFR (P=0.008, P<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that the PFR may be a valuable tool for measuring energy, energy-yielding nutrients and foods in groups of 9-month-olds infants and 36-month-olds young children.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of a 7-day pre-coded food record (PFR) method in 9-month-old infants against metabolizable energy intake (ME(DLW)) measured by doubly labeled water (DLW); additionally to compare PFR with a 7-day weighed food record (WFR) in 9-month-old infants and 36-month-old children. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: The study population consisted of 36 infants (age: 9.03±0.2 months) and 36 young children (age: 36.1±0.3 months) enrolled in a cross-over design of 7 consecutive days PFR vs 7 consecutive days WFR. Children were randomly assigned to one method during week 1, crossing over to the alternative method in week 2. Total energy expenditure (TEE) and ME(DLW) were obtained in the 9-month-old infants using the DLW technique for 7 days while recording with PFR. RESULTS: For the 9-month-old group, PFR showed a mean bias of +726 kJ/day, equivalent to 24%, (P<0.0001) compared with ME(DLW) (n=29). Using WFR as the reference in this group no between-method differences were found for energy, fat and carbohydrate. Energy intake in the 36-month-old children was 12% higher in the PFR vs WFR (P<0.0001), and protein plus total fat intake were overestimated with the PFR (P=0.008, P<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that the PFR may be a valuable tool for measuring energy, energy-yielding nutrients and foods in groups of 9-month-olds infants and 36-month-olds young children.
Authors: L B B Andersen; C B Pipper; E Trolle; R Bro; A Larnkjær; E M Carlsen; C Mølgaard; K F Michaelsen Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Marie T B Madsen; Anja P Biltoft-Jensen; Ellen Trolle; Lotte Lauritzen; Kim F Michaelsen; Camilla T Damsgaard Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 4.865
Authors: Anders Bergström; Thomas Hjort Skov; Martin Iain Bahl; Henrik Munch Roager; Line Brinch Christensen; Katrine Tschentscher Ejlerskov; Christian Mølgaard; Kim F Michaelsen; Tine Rask Licht Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Laurine B S Harsløf; Camilla T Damsgaard; Lars I Hellgren; Anders D Andersen; Ulla Vogel; Lotte Lauritzen Journal: Genes Nutr Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 5.523
Authors: Louise B B Andersen; Christian Mølgaard; Kim F Michaelsen; Emma M Carlsen; Rasmus Bro; Christian B Pipper Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Martin Frederik Laursen; Louise B B Andersen; Kim F Michaelsen; Christian Mølgaard; Ellen Trolle; Martin Iain Bahl; Tine Rask Licht Journal: mSphere Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 4.389