Literature DB >> 21826361

Classification of cell types using a microfluidic device for mechanical and electrical measurement on single cells.

Jian Chen1, Yi Zheng, Qingyuan Tan, Ehsan Shojaei-Baghini, Yan Liang Zhang, Jason Li, Preethy Prasad, Lidan You, Xiao Yu Wu, Yu Sun.   

Abstract

This paper presents a microfluidic system for cell type classification using mechanical and electrical measurements on single cells. Cells are aspirated continuously through a constriction channel with cell elongations and impedance profiles measured simultaneously. The cell transit time through the constriction channel and the impedance amplitude ratio are quantified as cell's mechanical and electrical property indicators. The microfluidic device and measurement system were used to characterize osteoblasts (n=206) and osteocytes (n=217), revealing that osteoblasts, compared with osteocytes, have a larger cell elongation length (64.51 ± 14.98 μm vs. 39.78 ± 7.16 μm), a longer transit time (1.84 ± 1.48 s vs. 0.94 ± 1.07 s), and a higher impedance amplitude ratio (1.198 ± 0.071 vs. 1.099 ± 0.038). Pattern recognition using the neural network was applied to cell type classification, resulting in classification success rates of 69.8% (transit time alone), 85.3% (impedance amplitude ratio alone), and 93.7% (both transit time and impedance amplitude ratio as input to neural network) for osteoblasts and osteocytes. The system was also applied to test EMT6 (n=747) and EMT6/AR1.0 cells (n=770, EMT6 treated by doxorubicin) that have a comparable size distribution (cell elongation length: 51.47 ± 11.33 μm vs. 50.09 ± 9.70 μm). The effects of cell size on transit time and impedance amplitude ratio were investigated. Cell classification success rates were 51.3% (cell elongation alone), 57.5% (transit time alone), 59.6% (impedance amplitude ratio alone), and 70.2% (both transit time and impedance amplitude ratio). These preliminary results suggest that biomechanical and bioelectrical parameters, when used in combination, could provide a higher cell classification success rate than using electrical or mechanical parameter alone. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826361     DOI: 10.1039/c1lc20473d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  36 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping.

Authors:  Daniel R Gossett; Henry T K Tse; Serena A Lee; Yong Ying; Anne G Lindgren; Otto O Yang; Jianyu Rao; Amander T Clark; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Characterizing deformability and surface friction of cancer cells.

Authors:  Sangwon Byun; Sungmin Son; Dario Amodei; Nathan Cermak; Josephine Shaw; Joon Ho Kang; Vivian C Hecht; Monte M Winslow; Tyler Jacks; Parag Mallick; Scott R Manalis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Recent advances in the use of microfluidic technologies for single cell analysis.

Authors:  Travis W Murphy; Qiang Zhang; Lynette B Naler; Sai Ma; Chang Lu
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  A microfluidic technique to probe cell deformability.

Authors:  David J Hoelzle; Bino A Varghese; Clara K Chan; Amy C Rowat
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  On-chip pressure sensor using single-layer concentric chambers.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Dylan Tsai; Makoto Kaneko
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Microfluidic flow cytometry: The role of microfabrication methodologies, performance and functional specification.

Authors:  Anil B Shrirao; Zachary Fritz; Eric M Novik; Gabriel M Yarmush; Rene S Schloss; Jeffrey D Zahn; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2018-03-16

Review 7.  Improving cancer therapies by targeting the physical and chemical hallmarks of the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Jill W Ivey; Mohammad Bonakdar; Akanksha Kanitkar; Rafael V Davalos; Scott S Verbridge
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  Microfluidic Iterative Mechanical Characteristics (iMECH) Analyzer for Single-Cell Metastatic Identification.

Authors:  Hesam Babahosseini; Jeannine S Strobl; Masoud Agah
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  Single-Cell Mechanical Characteristics Analyzed by Multiconstriction Microfluidic Channels.

Authors:  Xiang Ren; Parham Ghassemi; Hesam Babahosseini; Jeannine S Strobl; Masoud Agah
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 7.711

10.  Clusters of circulating tumor cells traverse capillary-sized vessels.

Authors:  Sam H Au; Brian D Storey; John C Moore; Qin Tang; Yeng-Long Chen; Sarah Javaid; A Fatih Sarioglu; Ryan Sullivan; Marissa W Madden; Ryan O'Keefe; Daniel A Haber; Shyamala Maheswaran; David M Langenau; Shannon L Stott; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.