Literature DB >> 21826254

Visual discomfort with stereo displays: Effects of viewing distance and direction of vergence-accommodation conflict.

Takashi Shibata1, Joohwan Kim, David M Hoffman, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

Prolonged use of conventional stereo displays causes viewer discomfort and fatigue because of the vergence-accommodation conflict. We used a novel volumetric display to examine how viewing distance and the sign of the vergence-accommodation conflict affect discomfort and fatigue. In the first experiment, we presented a fixed conflict at short, medium, and long viewing distances. We compared subjects' symptoms in that condition and one in which there was no conflict. We observed more discomfort and fatigue with a given vergence-accommodation conflict at the longer distances. The second experiment compared symptoms when the conflict had one sign compared to when it had the opposite sign at short, medium, and long distances. We observed greater symptoms with uncrossed disparities at long distances and with crossed disparities at short distances. These findings help define comfortable viewing conditions for stereo displays.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826254      PMCID: PMC3150963          DOI: 10.1117/12.872347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  3 in total

1.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display.

Authors:  Gordon D Love; David M Hoffman; Philip J W Hands; James Gao; Andrew K Kirby; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.894

  3 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Augmented and Mixed Reality: Technologies for Enhancing the Future of IR.

Authors:  Brian J Park; Stephen J Hunt; Charles Martin; Gregory J Nadolski; Bradford J Wood; Terence P Gade
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Visual discomfort and depth-of-field.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Tingting Zhang; Harold T Nefs; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-16

3.  VEP Responses to Op-Art Stimuli.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Alasdair D F Clarke; Petra M J Pollux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Quality Index for Stereoscopic Images by Separately Evaluating Adding and Subtracting.

Authors:  Jiachen Yang; Yancong Lin; Zhiqun Gao; Zhihan Lv; Wei Wei; Houbing Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Viewing 3D TV over two months produces no discernible effects on balance, coordination or eyesight.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Alan Godfrey; Iwo Bohr; Jennifer Simonotto; Brook Galna; Tom V Smulders
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Perceptual assessment of environmental stability modulates postural sway.

Authors:  Natalia Cooper; Iain Cant; Mark D White; Georg F Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Balance and coordination after viewing stereoscopic 3D television.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Jennifer Simonotto; Iwo Bohr; Alan Godfrey; Brook Galna; Lynn Rochester; Tom V Smulders
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator.

Authors:  Denise S Ryan; Rose K Sia; Jennifer B Eaddy; Lorie A Logan; Jide O Familoni; Hind Beydoun; Samantha B Rodgers; Bruce A Rivers
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2020-01-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.