| Literature DB >> 21826147 |
Filippo Camerota1, Manuela Galli, Claudia Celletti, Sara Vimercati, Veronica Cimolin, Nunzio Tenore, Guido M Filippi, Giorgio Albertini.
Abstract
Objective. To investigate quantitatively and objectively the effects of repeated muscle vibration (rMV) of triceps surae on the gait pattern in a 5-year-old patient with Cerebral Palsy with equinus foot deformity due to calf spasticity. Methods. The patient was assessed before and one month after the rMV treatment using Gait Analysis. Results. rMV had positive effects on the patient's gait pattern, as for spatio-temporal parameters (the stance duration and the step length increased their values after the treatment) and kinematics. The pelvic tilt reduced its anteversion and the hip reduced the high flexion evidenced at baseline; the knee and the ankle gained a more physiological pattern bilaterally. The Gillette Gait Index showed a significant reduction of its value bilaterally, representing a global improvement of the child's gait pattern. Conclusions. The rMV technique seems to be an effective option for the gait pattern improvement in CP, which can be used also in very young patient. Significant improvements were displayed in terms of kinematics at all lower limb joints, not only at the joint directly involved by the treatment (i.e., ankle and knee joints) but also at proximal joints (i.e., pelvis and hip joint).Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21826147 PMCID: PMC3150156 DOI: 10.1155/2011/359126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Med
Figure 1Picture representing the child during the treatment and the site of intervention.
Clinical examinations of the ankle for the child in the PRE and POST sessions.
| PRE | POST | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Right | Left | |
| R1 with knee fully extended (°) | 30 | 40 | 45 | 45 |
| R2 with knee fully extended (°) | 15 | 20 | 25 | 25 |
| R1 with knee flexed at 90° (°) | 15 | 25 | 25 | 30 |
| R2 with knee flexed at 90° (°) | 10 | 15 | 20 | 20 |
R1: full passive ankle range of motion; R2: ankle angle obtained after the dorsiflexion as fast as possible.
Figure 2Comparison of GGI index (mean and standard deviation) for the subject (right and left side mean values with standard deviation) in the PRE and POST sessions; in grey the normative range is represented. *P < .05, PRE versus POST.
Mean (standard deviation) values of the spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters for the child in the PRE and POST sessions and for the control group (CG).
| PRE | POST | CG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Right | Left | ||
|
| |||||
| Velocity (m/s) | 0.2 (0.2) | 0.3 (0.1) | 1.2 (0.2) | ||
| Stance (%) | 78.0 (1.2) | 69.0 (2.0) | 71.3 (2.1)* | 72.3 (1.2) | 59.5 (1.5) |
| Step length (mm) | 181.0 (9.8) | 189.0 (3.9) | 303.3 (4.0)* | 206.7 (3.5)* | 546.2 (42.4) |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Mean value | 28.1 (2.3) | 29.7 (1.3) | 17.2 (1.3)* | 17.1 (2.3)* | 8.8 (4.3) |
| ROM | 12.8 (1.6) | 11.8 (1.9) | 12.8 (1.9) | 11.0 (1.6) | 1.6 (3.6) |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| IC | 48.8 (2.3) | 30.4 (1.5) | 39.3 (5.1)* | 38.5 (5.2) | 27.2 (7.5) |
| Min St | 18.1 (2.5) | 8.7 (1.9) | 1.2 (2.7)* | −9.3 (2.7)* | −12.9 (7.6) |
| Max Sw | 64.1 (1.4) | 46.8 (2.3) | 48.1 (0.7)* | 61.4 (1.8)* | 32.4 (7.1) |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| IC | 39.9 (2.4) | −5.1 (1.7) | 29.4 (5.0)* | 20.4 (6.1)* | 6.7 (5.5) |
| Min St | 13.8 (2.8) | −14.7 (2.4) | 9.3 (4.8)* | −9.9 (2.1) | 0.1 (3.8) |
| Max Sw | 67.7 (3.6) | 20.0 (2.6) | 69.2 (4.5) | 51.3 (1.7)* | 56.3 (6.3) |
| ROM | 53.9 (3.5) | 34.6 (2.7) | 61.3 (3.7)* | 60.9 (3.0)* | 55.8 (4.7) |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| IC | −1.2 (2.6) | −28.1 (2.8) | −0.6 (2.0) | 1.9 (3.7)* | 1.8 (5.8) |
| Max St | 3.4 (3.8) | −28.1 (2.5) | 5.6 (6.0) | 4.9 (3.7)* | 12.2 (5.5) |
| Max Sw | −10.6 (2.9) | −10.0 (2.1) | 4.8 (3.1)* | 2.4 (3.9)* | 5.8 (6.5) |
| Min St | −34.7 (1.8) | −37.8 (3.2) | −32.4 (1.9) | −20.8 (3.1)* | −12.8 (5.9) |
| ROM St | 38.1 (4.1) | 8.8 (2.9) | 38.1 (0.7) | 25.3 (2.6)* | 23.4 (4.8) |
*P < .05, PRE versus POST.
IC: initial Contact; Max: maximum value; min: minimum value; St: stance phase; Sw: swing phase; ROM: range of motion.