OBJECTIVE: To empirically assess the concept that Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers significantly depart from normality in a temporally ordered manner. DESIGN: Validation sample. SETTING: Multisite, referral centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 401 elderly participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who were cognitively normal, who had mild cognitive impairment, or who had AD dementia. We compared the proportions of 3 AD biomarker values (the Aβ42 level in cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], the total tau level in CSF, and the hippocampal volume adjusted for intracranial volume [hereafter referred to as the adjusted hippocampal volume]) that were abnormal as cognitive impairment worsened. Cut points demarcating normal vs abnormal for each biomarker were established by maximizing diagnostic accuracy in independent autopsy samples. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three AD biomarkers (ie, the CSF Aβ42 level, the CSF total tau level, and the adjusted hippocampal volume). RESULTS: Within each clinical group of the entire sample (n = 401), the CSF Aβ42 level was abnormal more often than was the CSF total tau level or the adjusted hippocampal volume. Among the 298 participants with both baseline and 12-month data, the proportion of participants with an abnormal Aβ42 level did not change from baseline to 12 months in any group. The proportion of participants with an abnormal total tau level increased from baseline to 12 months in cognitively normal participants (P = .05) but not in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia. For 209 participants with an abnormal CSF Aβ42 level at baseline, the percentage with an abnormal adjusted hippocampal volume but normal CSF total tau level increased from baseline to 12 months in participants with mild cognitive impairment. No change in the percentage of MCI participants with an abnormal total tau level was seen between baseline and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in the CSF Aβ42 level denotes a pathophysiological process that significantly departs from normality (ie, becomes dynamic) early, whereas the CSF total tau level and the adjusted hippocampal volume are biomarkers of downstream pathophysiological processes. The CSF total tau level becomes dynamic before the adjusted hippocampal volume, but the hippocampal volume is more dynamic in the clinically symptomatic mild cognitive impairment and AD dementia phases of the disease than is the CSF total tau level.
OBJECTIVE: To empirically assess the concept that Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers significantly depart from normality in a temporally ordered manner. DESIGN: Validation sample. SETTING: Multisite, referral centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 401 elderly participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who were cognitively normal, who had mild cognitive impairment, or who had AD dementia. We compared the proportions of 3 AD biomarker values (the Aβ42 level in cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], the total tau level in CSF, and the hippocampal volume adjusted for intracranial volume [hereafter referred to as the adjusted hippocampal volume]) that were abnormal as cognitive impairment worsened. Cut points demarcating normal vs abnormal for each biomarker were established by maximizing diagnostic accuracy in independent autopsy samples. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three AD biomarkers (ie, the CSF Aβ42 level, the CSF total tau level, and the adjusted hippocampal volume). RESULTS: Within each clinical group of the entire sample (n = 401), the CSF Aβ42 level was abnormal more often than was the CSF total tau level or the adjusted hippocampal volume. Among the 298 participants with both baseline and 12-month data, the proportion of participants with an abnormal Aβ42 level did not change from baseline to 12 months in any group. The proportion of participants with an abnormal total tau level increased from baseline to 12 months in cognitively normal participants (P = .05) but not in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia. For 209 participants with an abnormal CSF Aβ42 level at baseline, the percentage with an abnormal adjusted hippocampal volume but normal CSF total tau level increased from baseline to 12 months in participants with mild cognitive impairment. No change in the percentage of MCI participants with an abnormal total tau level was seen between baseline and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in the CSF Aβ42 level denotes a pathophysiological process that significantly departs from normality (ie, becomes dynamic) early, whereas the CSF total tau level and the adjusted hippocampal volume are biomarkers of downstream pathophysiological processes. The CSF total tau level becomes dynamic before the adjusted hippocampal volume, but the hippocampal volume is more dynamic in the clinically symptomatic mild cognitive impairment and AD dementia phases of the disease than is the CSF total tau level.
Authors: Victor L Villemagne; Kerryn E Pike; Gaël Chételat; Kathryn A Ellis; Rachel S Mulligan; Pierrick Bourgeat; Uwe Ackermann; Gareth Jones; Cassandra Szoeke; Olivier Salvado; Ralph Martins; Graeme O'Keefe; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: R D Terry; E Masliah; D P Salmon; N Butters; R DeTeresa; R Hill; L A Hansen; R Katzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1991-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Aarti R Shah; Daniel Marcus; Mark Mintun; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Prashanthi Vemuri; Jennifer L Whitwell; Kejal Kantarci; Keith A Josephs; Joseph E Parisi; Maria S Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen; Dennis W Dickson; Clifford R Jack Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Peter S Laviolette; Kelly O'Keefe; Jacqueline O'Brien; Dorene M Rentz; Maija Pihlajamaki; Gad Marshall; Bradley T Hyman; Dennis J Selkoe; Trey Hedden; Randy L Buckner; J Alex Becker; Keith A Johnson Journal: Neuron Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: N M Scheinin; S Aalto; J Koikkalainen; J Lötjönen; M Karrasch; N Kemppainen; M Viitanen; K Någren; S Helin; M Scheinin; J O Rinne Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J Alex Becker; Trey Hedden; Jeremy Carmasin; Jacqueline Maye; Dorene M Rentz; Deepti Putcha; Bruce Fischl; Douglas N Greve; Gad A Marshall; Stephen Salloway; Donald Marks; Randy L Buckner; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Timothy G Lesnick; Val Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Matt A Bernstein; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Bradley F Boeve; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-07
Authors: Karienn S Montgomery; George Edwards; Yona Levites; Ashok Kumar; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon Journal: Hippocampus Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 3.899
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; Gaël Chételat; Dennis Dickson; Anne M Fagan; Giovanni B Frisoni; William Jagust; Elizabeth C Mormino; Ronald C Petersen; Reisa A Sperling; Wiesje M van der Flier; Victor L Villemagne; Pieter J Visser; Stephanie J B Vos Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Matthew R Brier; Jewell B Thomas; Anne M Fagan; Jason Hassenstab; David M Holtzman; Tammie L Benzinger; John C Morris; Beau M Ances Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Rebecca L Koscik; Asenath La Rue; Erin M Jonaitis; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Sterling C Johnson; Barbara B Bendlin; Bruce P Hermann; Mark A Sager Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Ann Hake; Paula T Trzepacz; Shufang Wang; Peng Yu; Michael Case; Helen Hochstetler; Michael M Witte; Elisabeth K Degenhardt; Robert A Dean Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 21.566