Literature DB >> 21824120

Potential underuse, overuse, and inappropriate use of antidepressants in older veteran nursing home residents.

Joseph T Hanlon1, Xiaoqiang Wang, Nicholas G Castle, Roslyn A Stone, Steven M Handler, Todd P Semla, Mary Jo Pugh, Dan R Berlowitz, Maurice W Dysken.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine prevalence and resident- and site-level factors associated with potential underuse, overuse, and inappropriate use of antidepressants in older Veterans Affairs (VA) Community Living Center (CLC) residents.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study.
SETTING: One hundred thirty-three VA CLCs. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand six hundred ninety-two veterans aged 65 and older admitted between January 1, 2004, and June 3, 2005, with long stays (≥ 90 days). MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence of potential underuse, inappropriate use, and overuse of antidepressants in residents with and without depression (as documented according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes or Depression Rating Scale).
RESULTS: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed antidepressant. Of the 877 residents with depression, 25.4% did not receive an antidepressant, suggesting potential underuse. Of residents with depression who received antidepressants, 57.5% had potential inappropriate use due primarily to problems seen with drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Of the 2,815 residents who did not have depression, 1,190 (42.3%) were prescribed one or more antidepressants; only 48 (4.0%) of these had a Food and Drug Administration-approved labeled indication, suggesting potential overuse. Overall, only 17.6% of antidepressant use was appropriate (324/1,844). The only consistent resident factor associated with potential underuse and overuse use was taking an antipsychotic without evidence of schizophrenia (underuse: adjusted relative risk ratio (ARRR)=0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.33-0.94; overuse: adjusted odds ratio=1.52, 95% CI=1.21-1.91). Having moderate to severe pain (ARRR=1.54, 95% CI=1.08-2.20) and the prescribing of an anxiolytic or hypnotic (ARRR=1.33, 95% CI=1.02-1.74) increased the risk of potential inappropriate antidepressant use.
CONCLUSION: Potential problems with the use of antidepressants were frequently observed in older U.S. veteran CLC residents. Future studies are needed to examine the true risks and benefits of antidepressant use in CLC and non-VA nursing homes.
© 2011, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2011, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21824120      PMCID: PMC3158263          DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  33 in total

1.  Effects of cognitive performance on change in physical function in long-stay nursing home residents.

Authors:  Eleanor S McConnell; Carl F Pieper; Richard J Sloane; Laurence G Branch
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  A comprehensive clinical assessment tool to inform policy and practice: applications of the minimum data set.

Authors:  Vincent Mor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Depression among institutionalized aged: assessment and prevalence estimation.

Authors:  P A Parmelee; I R Katz; M P Lawton
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-01

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Measuring the quality of depression care in a large integrated health system.

Authors:  Andrea Charbonneau; Amy K Rosen; Arlene S Ash; Richard R Owen; Boris Kader; Avron Spiro; Cheryl Hankin; Lawrence R Herz; Mary Jo V Pugh; Lewis Kazis; Donald R Miller; Dan R Berlowitz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Prevalence and correlates of recognized depression in U.S. nursing homes.

Authors:  Richard N Jones; Edward R Marcantonio; Terry Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Inadequate treatment of depressed nursing home elderly.

Authors:  L L Heston; J Garrard; L Makris; R L Kane; S Cooper; T Dunham; D Zelterman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Identifying physician-recognized depression from administrative data: consequences for quality measurement.

Authors:  Claire M Spettell; Terry C Wall; Jeroan Allison; Jaimee Calhoun; Richard Kobylinski; Rachel Fargason; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The use of atypical antipsychotics in nursing homes.

Authors:  Rosa Liperoti; Vincent Mor; Kate L Lapane; Claudio Pedone; Giovanni Gambassi; Roberto Bernabei
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Off-label prescribing in older patients.

Authors:  Stephen H D Jackson; Paul A F Jansen; Arduino A Mangoni
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Underprescription of beneficial medicines in older people: causes, consequences and prevention.

Authors:  Antonio Cherubini; Andrea Corsonello; Fabrizia Lattanzio
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Age-related changes in antidepressant pharmacokinetics and potential drug-drug interactions: a comparison of evidence-based literature and package insert information.

Authors:  Richard D Boyce; Steven M Handler; Jordan F Karp; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2012-01-27

4.  Influence of central nervous system-acting drugs on results of cognitive testing in geriatric inpatients.

Authors:  M Gogol; H Hartmann; S Wustmann; A Simm
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  Elderly patients treated with psychotropic medicines admitted to hospital: associated characteristics and inappropriate use.

Authors:  Xavier Vidal; Antonia Agustí; Antoni Vallano; Francesc Formiga; Antonio Fernández Moyano; Juana García; Alfonso López-Soto; Nieves Ramírez-Duque; Olga H Torres; José Barbé; Antonio San-José
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Non-tricyclic and Non-selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants and Recurrent Falls in Frail Older Women.

Authors:  Jennifer G Naples; Mary P Kotlarczyk; Subashan Perera; Susan L Greenspan; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 7.  The Role of Opioid Analgesics in Geriatric Pain Management.

Authors:  Jennifer Greene Naples; Walid F Gellad; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.076

8.  Potentially suboptimal prescribing for older veteran nursing home patients with dementia.

Authors:  Joseph T Hanlon; Sherrie L Aspinall; Steven M Handler; Walid F Gellad; Roslyn A Stone; Todd P Semla; Mary Jo V Pugh; Maurice W Dysken
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  The use of antidepressants in Belgian nursing homes: focus on indications and dosages in the PHEBE study.

Authors:  Jolyce Bourgeois; Monique M Elseviers; Luc Van Bortel; Mirko Petrovic; Robert H Vander Stichele
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Epidemiology of drug-disease interactions in older veteran nursing home residents.

Authors:  Sherrie L Aspinall; Xinhua Zhao; Todd P Semla; Francesca E Cunningham; Allison M Paquin; Mary Jo Pugh; Kenneth E Schmader; Roslyn A Stone; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.