Literature DB >> 21823171

Impact of treatment approach on maternal and neonatal outcome in pregnant opioid-maintained women.

Verena Metz1, Reinhold Jagsch, Nina Ebner, Johanna Würzl, Anna Pribasnig, Constantin Aschauer, Gabriele Fischer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare maternal and neonatal outcome of opioid-dependent women maintained on buprenorphine or methadone throughout pregnancy in a randomized double-blind double-dummy clinical trial (CT) with a comparison group undergoing a structured standard protocol (SP) at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
METHODS: One hundred and fourteen subjects were included in the analysis, with 77 in SP (n = 51 methadone, n = 26 buprenorphine), and 37 in CT (n = 19 methadone, n = 18 buprenorphine), comparing maternal concomitant consumption during third trimester, demographic birth data, duration of treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), morphine dose for NAS treatment and length of hospital stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Both study groups yielded healthy neonates with no significant demographic differences and equivalently low rates of positive maternal urine toxicologies. However, NAS parameters were significantly better in CT regarding total medication dose administered to neonates (p = 0.014) and LOS (p = 0.015). Superior results were achieved in buprenorphine compared with methadone-exposed neonates regarding gestational age at birth (p = 0.003), birth weight (p = 0.011), total morphine dose administered (p = 0.008), NAS treatment duration (p = 0.008) and LOS (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Comparably favorable outcome for mothers and infants and efficacy and safety of opioid medications were shown in both treatment approaches. Neonatal care could benefit from transferring successful CT procedures into clinical practice.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823171      PMCID: PMC5494260          DOI: 10.1002/hup.1224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0885-6222            Impact factor:   1.672


  38 in total

1.  Treatment of opioid dependence in pregnant women.

Authors:  G Fischer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Relationship between maternal methadone dosage and neonatal withdrawal.

Authors:  Jodi S Dashe; Jeanne S Sheffield; Debora A Olscher; Sally J Todd; Gregory L Jackson; George D Wendel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Neonatal drug withdrawal. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  [Prospective study of favorable factors in follow-up of drug addicted patients--apropos of 257 patients of the Cassini Center in Paris].

Authors:  J L Goeb; J Coste; T Bigot; I Ferrand
Journal:  Encephale       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.291

5.  Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent patients: effects on the neonatal abstinence syndrome.

Authors:  Hendree E Jones; Rolley E Johnson; Donald R Jasinski; Kevin E O'Grady; Christian A Chisholm; Robin E Choo; Michael Crocetti; Robert Dudas; Cheryl Harrow; Marilyn A Huestis; Lauren M Jansson; Michael Lantz; Barry M Lester; Lorraine Milio
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Clinical characteristics of central European and North American samples of pregnant women screened for opioid agonist treatment.

Authors:  A S Unger; P R Martin; K Kaltenbach; S M Stine; S H Heil; H E Jones; A M Arria; M G Coyle; P Selby; G Fischer
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Buprenorphine and methadone treatment of opiate dependence during pregnancy: comparison of fetal growth and neonatal outcomes in two consecutive case series.

Authors:  Johan Kakko; Markus Heilig; Ihsan Sarman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Effects of voucher-based incentives on abstinence from cigarette smoking and fetal growth among pregnant women.

Authors:  Sarah H Heil; Stephen T Higgins; Ira M Bernstein; Laura J Solomon; Randall E Rogers; Colleen S Thomas; Gary J Badger; Mary Ellen Lynch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Buprenorphine maintenance in pregnant opiate addicts.

Authors:  G Fischer; P Etzersdorfer; H Eder; R Jagsch; M Langer; M Weninger
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 10.  Treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women: clinical and research issues.

Authors:  Hendree E Jones; Peter R Martin; Sarah H Heil; Karol Kaltenbach; Peter Selby; Mara G Coyle; Susan M Stine; Kevin E O'Grady; Amelia M Arria; Gabriele Fischer
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2008-01-14
View more
  15 in total

1.  Factors associated with buprenorphine versus methadone use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Debra Bogen; Gale Richardson; Seo Young Park; Shannon L Dunn; Nancy Day
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 2.  Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy: Health Policy and Practice in the Midst of an Epidemic.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Stephen W Patrick
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The comparative safety of buprenorphine versus methadone in pregnancy-what about confounding?

Authors:  Susan B Brogly; Kelley Saia; Sonia Hernández-Diaz; Martha Werler; Paola Sebastiani
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Prescription Opioids in Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mahsa M Yazdy; Rishi J Desai; Susan B Brogly
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2015-04-01

5.  Methadone Versus Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Dependence and Risk of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Authors:  Lara S Lemon; Steve N Caritis; Raman Venkataramanan; Robert W Platt; Lisa M Bodnar
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Maternal buprenorphine treatment and infant outcome.

Authors:  Lauren M Jansson; Martha L Velez; Krystle McConnell; Nancy Spencer; Michelle Tuten; Hendree Jones; Rebeca Rios; Van L King; Neeraj Gandotra; Lorraine Millio; Janet A DiPietro
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Neonatal outcomes and their relationship to maternal buprenorphine dose during pregnancy.

Authors:  Hendrée E Jones; Erin Dengler; Anna Garrison; Kevin E O'Grady; Carl Seashore; Evette Horton; Kim Andringa; Lauren M Jansson; John Thorp
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Confounding of the Comparative Safety of Prenatal Opioid Agonist Therapy.

Authors:  Susan B Brogly; Kristen A Hahn; Sonia Hernandez Diaz; Martha Werler
Journal:  J Addict Res Ther       Date:  2015-12-31

9.  Neonatal Outcomes in a Medicaid Population With Opioid Dependence.

Authors:  Susan B Brogly; Sonia Hernández-Diaz; Emily Regan; Ela Fadli; Kristen A Hahn; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  A Comparison of Buprenorphine + Naloxone to Buprenorphine and Methadone in the Treatment of Opioid Dependence during Pregnancy: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Ingunn O Lund; Gabriele Fischer; Gabrielle K Welle-Strand; Kevin E O'Grady; Kimber Debelak; William R Morrone; Hendrée E Jones
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2013-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.