| Literature DB >> 15943939 |
Hendree E Jones1, Rolley E Johnson, Donald R Jasinski, Kevin E O'Grady, Christian A Chisholm, Robin E Choo, Michael Crocetti, Robert Dudas, Cheryl Harrow, Marilyn A Huestis, Lauren M Jansson, Michael Lantz, Barry M Lester, Lorraine Milio.
Abstract
This study was designed to compare the neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in neonates of methadone and buprenorphine maintained pregnant opioid-dependent women and to provide preliminary safety and efficacy data for a larger multi-center trial. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, flexible dosing, parallel-group controlled trial was conducted in a comprehensive drug-treatment facility that included residential and ambulatory care. Participants were opioid-dependent pregnant women and their neonates. Treatment involved daily administration of either sublingual buprenorphine or oral methadone using flexible dosing of 4-24 mg or 20-100 mg, respectively. Primary a priori outcome measures were: (1) number of neonates treated for NAS; (2) amount of opioid agonist medication used to treat NAS; (3) length of neonatal hospitalization; and (4) peak NAS score. Two of 10 (20%) buprenorphine-exposed and 5 of 11 (45.5%) methadone-exposed neonates were treated for NAS (p=.23). Total amount of opioid-agonist medication administered to treat NAS in methadone-exposed neonates was three times greater than for buprenorphine-exposed neonates (93.1 versus 23.6; p=.13). Length of hospitalization was shorter for buprenorphine-exposed than for methadone-exposed neonates (p=.021). Peak NAS total scores did not significantly differ between groups (p=.25). Results suggest that buprenorphine is not inferior to methadone on outcome measures assessing NAS and maternal and neonatal safety when administered starting in the second trimester of pregnancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15943939 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.11.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend ISSN: 0376-8716 Impact factor: 4.492