Literature DB >> 21822674

Task relevance predicts gaze in videos of real moving scenes.

Christina J Howard1, Iain D Gilchrist, Tom Troscianko, Ardhendu Behera, David C Hogg.   

Abstract

Low-level stimulus salience and task relevance together determine the human fixation priority assigned to scene locations (Fecteau and Munoz in Trends Cogn Sci 10(8):382-390, 2006). However, surprisingly little is known about the contribution of task relevance to eye movements during real-world visual search where stimuli are in constant motion and where the 'target' for the visual search is abstract and semantic in nature. Here, we investigate this issue when participants continuously search an array of four closed-circuit television (CCTV) screens for suspicious events. We recorded eye movements whilst participants watched real CCTV footage and moved a joystick to continuously indicate perceived suspiciousness. We find that when multiple areas of a display compete for attention, gaze is allocated according to relative levels of reported suspiciousness. Furthermore, this measure of task relevance accounted for twice the amount of variance in gaze likelihood as the amount of low-level visual changes over time in the video stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21822674     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2812-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  The effects of skill on the eye-hand span during musical sight-reading.

Authors:  S Furneaux; M F Land
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Scene content selected by active vision.

Authors:  Derrick J Parkhurst; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

3.  Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Roland J Baddeley; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Mark B Neider; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

8.  Where we look when we steer.

Authors:  M F Land; D N Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images.

Authors:  Robert J Peters; Asha Iyer; Laurent Itti; Christof Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Age-related differences in visual search in dynamic displays.

Authors:  Ensar Becic; Arthur F Kramer; Walter R Boot
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  On the Factors Causing Processing Difficulty of Multiple-Scene Displays.

Authors:  Matthew J Stainer; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-03-08

2.  Understanding Moment-to-Moment Processing of Visual Narratives.

Authors:  John P Hutson; Joseph P Magliano; Lester C Loschky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-11-16

3.  Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Christina J Howard; Iain D Gilchrist; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-06-26

4.  Looking for trouble: a description of oculomotor search strategies during live CCTV operation.

Authors:  Matthew J Stainer; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Suspiciousness perception in dynamic scenes: a comparison of CCTV operators and novices.

Authors:  Christina J Howard; Tom Troscianko; Iain D Gilchrist; Ardhendu Behera; David C Hogg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.