Literature DB >> 21822570

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a lateral parapatellar approach has high early survivorship.

Keith R Berend1, Michael C Kolczun, Joseph W George, Adolph V Lombardi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The literature suggests lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties are associated with low revision rates. However, there are fewer reports describing techniques for lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty and whether technique influences ROM and function compared to reports for medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We report our indications for lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty, how we perform this procedure, and the subsequent Knee Society scores, ROM, and revision and reoperation rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a retrospective review of electronic records from 2004 through 2008, we identified 93 patients who had 100 lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties. Indications were complete lateral bone-on-bone arthrosis with a correctible deformity and maintenance of the medial joint space on varus stress radiographs or isolated lateral disease by diagnostic arthroscopy. Average age was 68 years. Seventy percent of patients were women. At followup, we obtained Knee Society scores and ROM. Minimum followup was 24 months (average, 39 months; range, 24-81 months).
RESULTS: At followup, Knee Society scores averaged 46 for pain, 94 for clinical, and 89 for function, and ROM averaged 124°. Three patients had reoperations: one an open reduction and internal fixation for fracture at 2 years postoperatively, one an arthroscopy for a medial meniscal tear, and one a revision for pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observations, we believe complete cartilage loss laterally and correctible deformity with maintenance of the medial joint on varus stress radiographs are reasonable indications for lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. We recommend a lateral parapatellar approach can be utilized. The early reoperation and revision rates were low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21822570      PMCID: PMC3237974          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2005-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  40 in total

1.  In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean-Noël A Argenson; Richard D Komistek; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Douglas A Dennis; Eric J Northcut; Dylan T Anderson; Serge Agostini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  C E Ackroyd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

3.  Orthopaedic crossfire--can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure? in the affirmative.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Gerard Deschamps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jean-Noël A Argenson; Yamina Chevrol-Benkeddache; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi; J O Galante; R W Fermier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Ulf Svard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: new indications, more complications?

Authors:  Kelly G Vince; Leah T Cyran
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger.

Authors:  Donald W Pennington; John J Swienckowski; William B Lutes; Gregory N Drake
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  R D Scott; R F Santore
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  8 in total

1.  Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marco K Demange; Arvind Von Keudell; Christian Probst; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bearing design influences short- to mid-term survivorship, but not functional outcomes following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Laura J Kleeblad; Inger N Sierevelt; Wieger G Horstmann; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Experiences with lateral unicondylar prostheses].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; T Walker; T Gotterbarm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - a challenge].

Authors:  T Walker; P R Aldinger; M R Streit; T Gotterbarm
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Reduction in tibiofemoral conformity in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is more representative of normal knee kinematics.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Jin-Ah Lee; Hwa-Yong Lee; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Hyun-Seok Chung; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  A Medial Subvastus Approach for Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Technique Description and Early Outcome Results.

Authors:  Robert M Fuller; Daniel I Wicker; Grace W Getman; Katherine S Christensen; Christian P Christensen
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-06-18

7.  Survival of medial versus lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seung-Beom Han; Sang-Soo Lee; Kyoung-Ho Kim; Jung-Taek Im; Phil-Sun Park; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Tjeerd Jager; Matthew S Dooley; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.