Literature DB >> 21821994

A cheap minimally painful and widely usable alternative for retrieving ureteral stents.

Haluk Söylemez1, Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar, Yaşar Bozkurt, Murat Atar, Necmettin Penbegül, Kadir Yildirim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a cheap, minimally painful and widely usable method for retrieving ureteral stents by using an ureteroscope. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with ureteral stents were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized into a cystoscopic (35 patients) and a ureteroscopic (32 patients) group. All stents were retrieved by a flexible cystoscope in the first group and by a ureteroscope in the second group under local anesthesia. Patients in each group were assessed for stented time, stent side, cause of stent placement, operative time, peroperative pain, postoperative pain, irritative voiding symptoms and hematuria. Also costs of instruments were calculated.
RESULTS: Stents were successfully retrieved in 67 patients. There were no statistical differences in the two groups regarding patient gender and age or stent side, operative time, stented time, mean operative pain score, irritative voiding symptom scores and hematuria. Total selling price was USD 20.399 for flexible instruments and USD 10.516 for rigid ones. Total maintenance price was higher in flexible instruments than in the rigid ones (USD 197.8 and 51.7 per use, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Ureteroscopic stent retrieval is a minimally painful, safe and highly tolerable method under local anesthesia as well as flexible cystoscopic retrieval. Also, it is a cheap and widely usable method.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21821994     DOI: 10.1159/000327610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  6 in total

1.  Urinary tract obstruction: Optimizing removal of ureteral stents.

Authors:  Sarah Payton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Guido Kamphuis; Guido Giusti; J L Palmero; J M Patterson; Silvia Proietti; Michael Straub; Jean de la Rosette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Feasibility and safety of magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent insertion and removal in children.

Authors:  Marc Chalhoub; Jules Kohaut; Nicolas Vinit; Nathalie Botto; Yves Aigrain; Yves Héloury; Henri Lottmann; Thomas Blanc
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Dae Ji Kim; Jeong Hwan Son; Seok Heun Jang; Jae Won Lee; Dae Sung Cho; Chae Hong Lim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Comparison of complications and short term results of conventional technique versus new technique during graft ureteral stent insertion in bari technique at Emam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia.

Authors:  A Taghizadeh-Afshari; M Alizadeh; S Farshid
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-09-18

6.  A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.

Authors:  Dehui Lai; Meiling Chen; Shifang Zha; Shawpong Wan
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.264

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.