Literature DB >> 21820936

[External validation of simple ultrasound rules of Timmerman on 122 ovarian tumors].

K Fathallah1, C Huchon, A-S Bats, U Metzger, M-A Lefrère-Belda, C Bensaid, F Lécuru.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation between the nature of the ovarian tumors presumed according to the ultrasound criteria of Timmerman and the final histological diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We made a prospective study during a period of 4 years, concerning consecutive patients having an ovarian tumor, investigated by pelvic ultrasonography using Timmerman's rules estimating their benign or malignant characteristics in order to determine the efficiency of this score. The diagnostic reference was histology. Sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were calculated with their 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients having adnexal masse were included between January 2002 and December 2005. Among these tumors, 88.5% (108/122) were benign, and 11.5% (14/122) were malignant or borderline. The ultrasound-based rules of classification were applicable for 89.3% (109/122) of them. The sensitivity of these rules was 73% (95% CI [45-100]) and the specificity was 97% (IC 95% CI [94-100]). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Most adnexal masses can be classified according to the ultrasound simple rules of the score of Timmerman with a good specificity to eliminate their malignant or borderline characteristics. Tumors which cannot be classified according to these rules must be referred to an expert ultrasonographist.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21820936     DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil        ISSN: 1297-9589


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of IOTA Simple Ultrasound Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumours.

Authors:  Sugandha Garg; Amarjit Kaur; Jaswinder Kaur Mohi; Preet Kanwal Sibia; Navkiran Kaur
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  IOTA Simple Ultrasound Rules for Triage of Adnexal Mass: Experience from South India.

Authors:  Jyothi Shetty; Aruna Saradha; Deeksha Pandey; Rajeshwari Bhat; Sunanda Bharatnur
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-05-03

3.  Towards an evidence-based approach for diagnosis and management of adnexal masses: findings of the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) studies.

Authors:  J Kaijser
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

4.  Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.

Authors:  A Sayasneh; L Wynants; J Preisler; J Kaijser; S Johnson; C Stalder; R Husicka; Y Abdallah; F Raslan; A Drought; A A Smith; S Ghaem-Maghami; E Epstein; B Van Calster; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Strategies to diagnose ovarian cancer: new evidence from phase 3 of the multicentre international IOTA study.

Authors:  A Testa; J Kaijser; L Wynants; D Fischerova; C Van Holsbeke; D Franchi; L Savelli; E Epstein; A Czekierdowski; S Guerriero; R Fruscio; F P G Leone; I Vergote; T Bourne; L Valentin; B Van Calster; D Timmerman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Association between the sonographer's experience and diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules.

Authors:  Chun-Ping Ning; Xiaoli Ji; Hong-Qiao Wang; Xiao-Ying Du; Hai-Tao Niu; Shi-Bao Fang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.