Literature DB >> 21820372

Targeting ATR and Chk1 kinases for cancer treatment: a new model for new (and old) drugs.

Luis I Toledo1, Matilde Murga, Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo.   

Abstract

Trying to kill cancer cells by generating DNA damage is by no means a new idea. Radiotherapy and genotoxic drugs are routinely used in cancer therapy. More recent developments also explored the potential of targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) in order to increase the toxicity of radio- and chemo- therapy. Chk1 inhibitors have pioneered studies in this regard. Interestingly, early studies noted that Chk1 inhibitors were particularly toxic for p53-deficient cells. The model proposed for this observation was that this effect was due to the simultaneous abrogation of the G2 (Chk1) and G1 (p53) checkpoints. We here challenge this view, and propose a model where the toxicity of Chk1 inhibitors is rather due to the fact that these compounds generate high loads of replicative stress (RS) during S-phase, which are further boosted by the less restrictive S-phase entry found in p53-deficient cells. This new model implies that the particular toxicity of Chk1 inhibitors might not be restricted to p53-deficient cells, but could be extended to other mutations that promote a promiscuous S-phase entry. In addition, this rationale also implies that the same effect should also be observed for other molecules that target the RS-response (RSR), such as inhibitors of the Chk1-activating kinase ATR.
Copyright © 2011 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21820372      PMCID: PMC3590794          DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oncol        ISSN: 1574-7891            Impact factor:   6.603


  62 in total

Review 1.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity.

Authors:  Karlene A Cimprich; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss.

Authors:  Yaroslava Ruzankina; Carolina Pinzon-Guzman; Amma Asare; Tony Ong; Laura Pontano; George Cotsarelis; Valerie P Zediak; Marielena Velez; Avinash Bhandoola; Eric J Brown
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Inhibition of human Chk1 causes increased initiation of DNA replication, phosphorylation of ATR targets, and DNA breakage.

Authors:  Randi G Syljuåsen; Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen; Kasper Fugger; Cecilia Lundin; Fredrik Johansson; Thomas Helleday; Maxwell Sehested; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Personalizing cancer treatment in the age of global genomic analyses: PALB2 gene mutations and the response to DNA damaging agents in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Maria C Villarroel; N V Rajeshkumar; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Ana De Jesus-Acosta; Siân Jones; Anirban Maitra; Ralph H Hruban; James R Eshleman; Alison Klein; Daniel Laheru; Ross Donehower; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 5.  Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  L H Hartwell; P Szankasi; C J Roberts; A W Murray; S H Friend
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes.

Authors:  Lee Zou; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma.

Authors:  Y Xu; T Ashley; E E Brainerd; R T Bronson; M S Meyn; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  A mouse model of ATR-Seckel shows embryonic replicative stress and accelerated aging.

Authors:  Matilde Murga; Samuel Bunting; Maria F Montaña; Rebeca Soria; Francisca Mulero; Marta Cañamero; Youngsoo Lee; Peter J McKinnon; Andre Nussenzweig; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage.

Authors:  Andrés J López-Contreras; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-10-30

10.  ATM regulates ATR chromatin loading in response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Myriam Cuadrado; Barbara Martinez-Pastor; Matilde Murga; Luis I Toledo; Paula Gutierrez-Martinez; Eva Lopez; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  88 in total

1.  Thresholds of replication stress signaling in cancer development and treatment.

Authors:  Jiri Bartek; Martin Mistrik; Jirina Bartkova
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Exploiting oncogene-induced replicative stress for the selective killing of Myc-driven tumors.

Authors:  Matilde Murga; Stefano Campaner; Andres J Lopez-Contreras; Luis I Toledo; Rebeca Soria; Maria F Montaña; Luana D' Artista; Thomas Schleker; Carmen Guerra; Elena Garcia; Mariano Barbacid; Manuel Hidalgo; Bruno Amati; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse.

Authors:  Frank B Couch; Carol E Bansbach; Robert Driscoll; Jessica W Luzwick; Gloria G Glick; Rémy Bétous; Clinton M Carroll; Sung Yun Jung; Jun Qin; Karlene A Cimprich; David Cortez
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Is activation of the intra-S checkpoint in human fibroblasts an important factor in protection against UV-induced mutagenesis?

Authors:  Christopher D Sproul; Shangbang Rao; Joseph G Ibrahim; William K Kaufmann; Marila Cordeiro-Stone
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  ATR Kinase Activity Limits Mutagenesis and Promotes the Clonogenic Survival of Quiescent Human Keratinocytes Exposed to UVB Radiation.

Authors:  Kavya Shaj; Rebekah J Hutcherson; Michael G Kemp
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 6.  Cell-free Xenopus egg extracts for studying DNA damage response pathways.

Authors:  Steven Cupello; Christine Richardson; Shan Yan
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.203

7.  DNA damage response, genetic instability and cancer: from mechanistic insights to personalized treatment.

Authors:  Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Significant expression of CHK1 and p53 in bladder urothelial carcinoma as potential therapeutic targets and prognosis.

Authors:  Linfeng Zheng; Yuping Zhu; Lei Lei; Wenyong Sun; Guoping Cheng; Shifeng Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Wild-type H- and N-Ras promote mutant K-Ras-driven tumorigenesis by modulating the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Elda Grabocka; Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta; Mathew J K Jones; Veronica Lubkov; Eyoel Yemanaberhan; Laura Taylor; Hao Hsuan Jeng; Dafna Bar-Sagi
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Depletion of ATR selectively sensitizes ATM-deficient human mammary epithelial cells to ionizing radiation and DNA-damaging agents.

Authors:  Yuxia Cui; Stela S Palii; Cynthia L Innes; Richard S Paules
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.