RATIONALE: Fibroblast growth factor homologous factors (FHFs), a subfamily of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) that are incapable of functioning as growth factors, are intracellular modulators of Na(+) channels and have been linked to neurodegenerative diseases. Although certain FHFs have been found in embryonic heart, they have not been reported in adult heart, and they have not been shown to regulate endogenous cardiac Na(+) channels or to participate in cardiac pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE: We tested whether FHFs regulate Na(+) channels in murine heart. METHODS AND RESULTS: We demonstrated that isoforms of FGF13 are the predominant FHFs in adult mouse ventricular myocytes. FGF13 binds directly to, and colocalizes with, the Na(V)1.5 Na(+) channel in the sarcolemma of adult mouse ventricular myocytes. Knockdown of FGF13 in adult mouse ventricular myocytes revealed a loss of function of Na(V)1.5-reduced Na(+) current density, decreased Na(+) channel availability, and slowed Na(V)1.5-reduced Na(+) current recovery from inactivation. Cell surface biotinylation experiments showed ≈45% reduction in Na(V)1.5 protein at the sarcolemma after FGF13 knockdown, whereas no changes in whole-cell Na(V)1.5 protein or in mRNA level were observed. Optical imaging in neonatal rat ventricular myocyte monolayers demonstrated slowed conduction velocity and a reduced maximum capture rate after FGF13 knockdown. CONCLUSION: These findings show that FHFs are potent regulators of Na(+) channels in adult ventricular myocytes and suggest that loss-of-function mutations in FHFs may underlie a similar set of cardiac arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies that result from Na(V)1.5 loss-of-function mutations.
RATIONALE: Fibroblast growth factor homologous factors (FHFs), a subfamily of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) that are incapable of functioning as growth factors, are intracellular modulators of Na(+) channels and have been linked to neurodegenerative diseases. Although certain FHFs have been found in embryonic heart, they have not been reported in adult heart, and they have not been shown to regulate endogenous cardiac Na(+) channels or to participate in cardiac pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE: We tested whether FHFs regulate Na(+) channels in murine heart. METHODS AND RESULTS: We demonstrated that isoforms of FGF13 are the predominant FHFs in adult mouse ventricular myocytes. FGF13 binds directly to, and colocalizes with, the Na(V)1.5 Na(+) channel in the sarcolemma of adult mouse ventricular myocytes. Knockdown of FGF13 in adult mouse ventricular myocytes revealed a loss of function of Na(V)1.5-reduced Na(+) current density, decreased Na(+) channel availability, and slowed Na(V)1.5-reduced Na(+) current recovery from inactivation. Cell surface biotinylation experiments showed ≈45% reduction in Na(V)1.5 protein at the sarcolemma after FGF13 knockdown, whereas no changes in whole-cell Na(V)1.5 protein or in mRNA level were observed. Optical imaging in neonatal rat ventricular myocyte monolayers demonstrated slowed conduction velocity and a reduced maximum capture rate after FGF13 knockdown. CONCLUSION: These findings show that FHFs are potent regulators of Na(+) channels in adult ventricular myocytes and suggest that loss-of-function mutations in FHFs may underlie a similar set of cardiac arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies that result from Na(V)1.5 loss-of-function mutations.
Authors: Regina Goetz; Katarzyna Dover; Fernanda Laezza; Nataly Shtraizent; Xiao Huang; Dafna Tchetchik; Anna V Eliseenkova; Chong-Feng Xu; Thomas A Neubert; David M Ornitz; Mitchell Goldfarb; Moosa Mohammadi Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Priscila Y Sato; Hassan Musa; Wanda Coombs; Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna; Gustavo A Patiño; Steven M Taffet; Lori L Isom; Mario Delmar Journal: Circ Res Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: D Misceo; M Fannemel; T Barøy; R Roberto; B Tvedt; T Jaeger; V Bryn; P Strømme; E Frengen Journal: Neurogenetics Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 2.660
Authors: Fernanda Laezza; Benjamin R Gerber; Jun-Yang Lou; Marie A Kozel; Hali Hartman; Ann Marie Craig; David M Ornitz; Jeanne M Nerbonne Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-10-31 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Fernanda Laezza; Angelika Lampert; Marie A Kozel; Benjamin R Gerber; Anthony M Rush; Jeanne M Nerbonne; Stephen G Waxman; Sulayman D Dib-Hajj; David M Ornitz Journal: Mol Cell Neurosci Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 4.314
Authors: John S Lowe; Oleg Palygin; Naina Bhasin; Thomas J Hund; Penelope A Boyden; Erwin Shibata; Mark E Anderson; Peter J Mohler Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Ye Chen-Izu; Robin M Shaw; Geoffrey S Pitt; Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Jon T Sack; Hugues Abriel; Richard W Aldrich; Luiz Belardinelli; Mark B Cannell; William A Catterall; Walter J Chazin; Nipavan Chiamvimonvat; Isabelle Deschenes; Eleonora Grandi; Thomas J Hund; Leighton T Izu; Lars S Maier; Victor A Maltsev; Celine Marionneau; Peter J Mohler; Sridharan Rajamani; Randall L Rasmusson; Eric A Sobie; Colleen E Clancy; Donald M Bers Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Céline Marionneau; Cheryl F Lichti; Pierre Lindenbaum; Flavien Charpentier; Jeanne M Nerbonne; R Reid Townsend; Jean Mérot Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Jessica A Hennessey; Cherisse A Marcou; Chuan Wang; Eric Q Wei; Chaojian Wang; David J Tester; Margherita Torchio; Federica Dagradi; Lia Crotti; Peter J Schwartz; Michael J Ackerman; Geoffrey S Pitt Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 6.343