Literature DB >> 21817035

Science policy. Changing incentives to publish.

Chiara Franzoni1, Giuseppe Scellato, Paula Stephan.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21817035     DOI: 10.1126/science.1197286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  26 in total

1.  Research efficiency: Perverse incentives.

Authors:  Paula Stephan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics.

Authors:  Paula Stephan; Reinhilde Veugelers; Jian Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A small field for fertile science: the low visibility of reproductive science in high impact journals.

Authors:  Francesca E Duncan; Benjamin Derman; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Ware; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Bibliometric profile of neurogenic bladder in the literature: a 20-year bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Bo Qu; Yan Shen; Xiao-Jing Su; Xiao-Yan Dong; Xue-Mei Chen; Yu-Hong Zhou; Hong-Ying Pi
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; Rodrigo Costas; Vincent Larivière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores.

Authors:  Mark D Lindner; Richard K Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Journal impact factor: Recent evaluation changes and Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Authors:  Brian Coughlin; Mary Cushman
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.