R S Heller1, A M Malek. 1. Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Division, Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flexible microstents, such as the closed-cell EN, have facilitated adjunctive coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Little data are available on the ability of the stent struts to maintain vessel-wall apposition once deployed in the tortuous cerebral vasculature and the prevalence of ISA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between geometric features of the parent vessel at the stent deployment site and prevalence of ISA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postprocedural 3T-MRA was performed in a cohort of 39 patients undergoing EN stent-assisted intracranial aneurysm coiling. 3T-MRA was analyzed for the presence of ISA and supplemented by angiographic C-arm FPCT (DynaCT). Parent vessel diameter, curvature radius, and stent-subtended arc angle were measured at the site of deployment and analyzed for prediction of ISA in the ICA. RESULTS: 3T-MRA uncovered a unique crescent flow pattern (CS) outside the EN struts, which was confirmed by FPCT to indicate ISA resulting from EN crimping. ISA was detected on 3T-MRA in 19/39 patients (49%). Univariate analysis revealed ISA in the ICA to correlate with a large stent-subtended angle, a small curvature radius, and a large diameter but not stent length or jailing versus a sequential technique. Multivariate analysis identified ISA to correlate with vessel-curvature radius (OR, 253; P = .009), stent-subtended angle (OR, 225; P = .005), and parent vessel diameter (OR, 8.49; P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, ISA was detectable by 3T-MRA in a significant proportion of patients undergoing EN stent-assisted coiling of ICA aneurysms in a vessel geometry- and stent-deployment location-dependent manner. This characteristic of EN coiling at this potentially tortuous location should be taken into account when selecting an endovascular strategy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flexible microstents, such as the closed-cell EN, have facilitated adjunctive coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Little data are available on the ability of the stent struts to maintain vessel-wall apposition once deployed in the tortuous cerebral vasculature and the prevalence of ISA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between geometric features of the parent vessel at the stent deployment site and prevalence of ISA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postprocedural 3T-MRA was performed in a cohort of 39 patients undergoing EN stent-assisted intracranial aneurysm coiling. 3T-MRA was analyzed for the presence of ISA and supplemented by angiographic C-arm FPCT (DynaCT). Parent vessel diameter, curvature radius, and stent-subtended arc angle were measured at the site of deployment and analyzed for prediction of ISA in the ICA. RESULTS: 3T-MRA uncovered a unique crescent flow pattern (CS) outside the EN struts, which was confirmed by FPCT to indicate ISA resulting from EN crimping. ISA was detected on 3T-MRA in 19/39 patients (49%). Univariate analysis revealed ISA in the ICA to correlate with a large stent-subtended angle, a small curvature radius, and a large diameter but not stent length or jailing versus a sequential technique. Multivariate analysis identified ISA to correlate with vessel-curvature radius (OR, 253; P = .009), stent-subtended angle (OR, 225; P = .005), and parent vessel diameter (OR, 8.49; P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, ISA was detectable by 3T-MRA in a significant proportion of patients undergoing EN stent-assisted coiling of ICA aneurysms in a vessel geometry- and stent-deployment location-dependent manner. This characteristic of EN coiling at this potentially tortuous location should be taken into account when selecting an endovascular strategy.
Authors: Kengo Tanabe; Patrick W Serruys; Muzaffer Degertekin; Eberhard Grube; Giulio Guagliumi; Wilhelm Urbaszek; Johannes Bonnier; Jean-Michel Lablanche; Tomasz Siminiak; Jan Nordrehaug; Hans Figulla; Janusz Drzewiecki; Adrian Banning; Karl Hauptmann; Dariusz Dudek; Nico Bruining; Ronald Hamers; Angela Hoye; Jurgen M R Ligthart; Clemens Disco; Jörg Koglin; Mary E Russell; Antonio Colombo Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stéphane Cook; Peter Wenaweser; Mario Togni; Michael Billinger; Cyrill Morger; Christian Seiler; Rolf Vogel; Otto Hess; Bernhard Meier; Stephan Windecker Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-05-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David Wells-Roth; Alessandra Biondi; Vallabh Janardhan; Kyle Chapple; Y Pierre Gobin; Howard A Riina Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: C C Phatouros; T Y Sasaki; R T Higashida; A M Malek; P M Meyers; C F Dowd; V V Halbach Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Dimytri A Siqueira; Alexandre A Abizaid; Jose de Ribamar Costa; Fausto Feres; Luiz A Mattos; Rodolfo Staico; Andrea A Abizaid; Luiz F Tanajura; Aurea Chaves; Marinella Centemero; Amanda G M R Sousa; J Eduardo M R Sousa Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Neil J Weissman; Stephen G Ellis; Eberhard Grube; Keith D Dawkins; Joel D Greenberg; Tift Mann; Louis A Cannon; Patrick A Cambier; Stephen Fernandez; Gary S Mintz; Lazar Mandinov; Joerg Koglin; Gregg W Stone Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: R M King; J-Y Chueh; I M J van der Bom; C F Silva; S L Carniato; G Spilberg; A K Wakhloo; M J Gounis Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andreas Keuler; Christian Taschner; Marc Alexander Brockmann; Hanne Boll; Katharina Förster; Lisa Lutz; Annegret Herrmann-Frank; Monika Lelgemann; Martin Schumacher Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: P Bouillot; O Brina; H Yilmaz; M Farhat; G Erceg; K-O Lovblad; M I Vargas; Z Kulcsar; V M Pereira Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 3.825