Literature DB >> 21816553

Inconsistency in 9 mm bullets measured with non-destructive X-ray computed tomography.

Jagadeesha Kumar1, Dirk Landheer, Jane Barnes-Warden, Paul Fenne, Alex Attridge, Mark A Williams.   

Abstract

Fundamental to any ballistic armour standard is the reference projectile that is to be defeated. Typically, for certification, consistency of bullets is assumed. Therefore, practical variations in bullet jacket dimensions can have far reaching consequences. Traditionally, internal dimensions could only be analysed by cutting bullets which rules out any subsequent ballistic assessment. Therefore, the use of a non-destructive X-ray computed tomography (CT) method is explored in this paper. A set of 10 bullets (9 mm DM11) was taken for analysing both intra and inter bullet jacket thickness variation. CT measurements of jacket thickness were validated with high resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. An image based analysis methodology has been developed to extract the jacket thickness map and the centre of gravity. Thickness variations of the order of 200 μm were found commonly across all the bullets along the length and an angular variation of up to 100 μm was found in a few bullets. Jacket thickness and centre of gravity were also calculated for the same bullets after impact and the variations between the pre- and post-impacted bullets were compared, by establishing a common physical reference. The results show that the proposed CT scanning approach and subsequent image analysis method can bring out the statistical variations in bullet geometry pre- and post impact effectively.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21816553     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  3 in total

1.  Tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating cubic splines: unfiltered x-ray spectra from 20 kV to 640 kV.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Is CT bulletproof? On the use of CT for characterization of bullets in forensic radiology.

Authors:  L E Paulis; J Kroll; L Heijnens; M Huijnen; R Gerretsen; W H Backes; P A M Hofman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Advantages of micro-CT in the case of a complex dismemberment.

Authors:  Kirsty Alsop; Danielle G Norman; Waltraud Baier; Jim Colclough; Mark A Williams
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.