| Literature DB >> 21816066 |
Inger Skrede1, Ingeborg B Engh, Manfred Binder, Tor Carlsen, Håvard Kauserud, Mika Bendiksby.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The fungal genus Serpula (Serpulaceae, Boletales) comprises several saprotrophic (brown rot) taxa, including the aggressive house-infecting dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans. Recent phylogenetic analyses have indicated that the ectomycorrhiza forming genera Austropaxillus and Gymnopaxillus cluster within Serpula. In this study we use DNA sequence data to investigate phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography of, and nutritional mode transitions in Serpulaceae.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21816066 PMCID: PMC3199774 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Serpulaceae phylogeny. The 50% majority rule consensus tree from a Bayesian analysis of a concatenated data set consisting of parts of nuclear ribosomal SSU, LSU, and 5.8S, the second largest subunit of the RNA polymerase II (rpb2), and the translation elongation factor 1α (tef 1). Bayesian posterior probabilities (above branches) of more than 0.9 and parsimony Jackknife values (below branches) above 50% are superimposed on the phylogenetic tree. Saprotrophic taxa are in brown whereas ECM taxa are in green with a shaded green box.
Figure 2Molecular dating analysis. The MCC chronogram of an Agaricomycetidae subset, with main focus on Boletales taxa, obtained from divergence time estimation using BEAST. Grey bars denote the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals of the posterior probability distribution of node ages. Calibrated nodes are numbered (see text for details). Bayesian posterior probabilities of more than 0.8 are indicated on branches. Numbers on the scale axis are in millions of years before present (MyBP). Black dots at nodes indicate monophyly-contraints used in the BEAST analysis.
Results from phylogenetic, dating and ancestral area analyses
| Node | Branch | Node age lognormal 2 | 95% HPD lognormal | Node age exponential2 | 95% HPD exponential | RASP | DEC (LAGRANGE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/51 | 68.75 | 57.93-80.08 | 69.46 | 58.36-81.25 | -- | -- |
| 2 | 0.66/-- | 60.07 | 48.23-71.46 | 60.27 | 48.65-72.11 | AB (0.576), ABC (0.400) | A (0.029), B (0.022), E (0.014), F (0.012)... |
| 3 | 1/61 | 56.80 | 34.97-59.63 | 46.64 | 33.5-59.03 | ABC (0.551), AB (0.316), BC (0.032), AC (0.031), B (0.018), A (0.018), ABCG (0.016) | A (0.035), B (0.033), G (0.027), C (0.023)... |
| 4 | 1/100 | 2.61 | 0.45-5.41 | 2.67 | 0.62-6.24 | AB (0.982), ABC (0.0163) | A (0.035), B (0.033), G (0.027), C (0.023)... |
| 5 | 1/90 | 50.44 | 35.15-65.82 | 50.72 | 33.61-67.35 | A (0.706), AB (0.125), ACB (0.038), C (0.018), AE (0.014), ABC (0.010) | A (0.031), E (0.024), F (0.021), B (0.010) |
| 6 | 1/100 | 22.03 | 12.40-31.92 | 22.33 | 13.09-31.68 | F (0.494), E (0.241), A (0.092), EF (0.079), AF (0.030), AE (0.015) | A (0.029), E (0.028), F (0.025), D (0.013)... |
| 7 | 1/95 | 15.22 | 6.63-24.43 | 15.40 | 7.48-24.56 | F (0.987) | F (0.198), E (0.044), EF (0.017) |
| 8 | --/100 | 15.71 | 7.46-24.47 | 15.87 | 8.23-25.38 | E (0.994), EF (0.078), F (0.017) | E (0.130), F (0.096), EF (0.037) |
| 9 | 1/100 | 15.88 | 11.63-21.00 | 16.25 | 11.53-21.06 | A (0.941), AE (0.025), AD (0.011) | A (0.044), E (0.024), F (0.019), D (0.013)... |
| 10 | 1/98 | 8.60 | 4.45-13.23 | 8.81 | 4.63-13.65 | A (0.905), AD (0.071), D (0.015) | A (0.140), D (0.026), E (0.022) |
| 11 | 1/100 | 1.19 | 0.05-2.91 | 1.32 | 0.11-3.12 | A (0.997) | A (0.251), D (0.079), AD (0.035) |
| 12 | 1/100 | 1.44 | 0.45-2.88 | 1.49 | 0.22-2.94 | D (0.941), AD (0.055) | D (0.260), A (0.094), AD (0.031) |
| 13 | 1/92 | 7.29 | 4.29-11.31 | 7.70 | 4.31-11.67 | A (0.883), AE (0.090), E (0.019) | A (0.140), D (0.026), E (0.022) |
Results from various analyses of Dataset2 (node numbers refer to Figure. 3): branch support, mean node ages, the 95% highest posterior density values (HPD; depicted as grey bars in Figure. 3) from analyses using a relaxed clock with lognormal and exponential settings, and inferred ancestral areas at internal nodes (RASP) and branches (DEC; relative probability of an area reported for branch leading to numbered node). Areas with a relative probability of > 0.01 in the DEC and RASP analyses are reported. Unit areas: A = western North America, B = eastern North America, C = western Eurasia, D = eastern Eurasia, E = southern South America, F = Australia + New Zealand, G = Old World Tropical.
1Bayesian posterior probability to the left and parsimony jackknife support to the right hand side of slash.
2Estimated age of divergence events in millions of years before present (depicted as a chronogram in Figure. 2).
*Not present for maxareas = 2
Figure 3Serpulaceae chronogram. Out-cut of Serpulaceae from the chronogram presented in Figure. 2 (the maximum clade credibility tree obtained from divergence time estimation using BEAST). Grey bars denote the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals of the posterior probability distribution of node ages. Nodes that are referred to in the text and in Table 1 are numbered and clades that are referred to in the text are numbered 1-4 to the right. Numbers on the scale axis are in millions of years before present (MyBP). Pie diagrams show the ancestral distributions estimated for internal nodes using a) DEC (LAGRANGE) and b) RASP. Only ancestral areas with probability > 0.01 are shown on the figure. Grey colour on pie diagrams indicate combined ancestral areas, and for nodes where a combined ancestral area is estimated as highly probable the combination is written next to the pie diagram. Abbreviations: Pli = Pliocene, NALB = North American landbridge, BLB = Bering landbridge, BLB2 = Bering landbridge 2, and GAI = Great American interchange.