Literature DB >> 21813749

FM velocity selectivity in the inferior colliculus is inherited from velocity-selective inputs and enhanced by spike threshold.

Joshua X Gittelman1, Na Li.   

Abstract

Frequency modulation (FM) is computed from the temporal sequence of activated auditory nerve fibers representing different frequencies. Most studies in the inferior colliculus (IC) have inferred from extracellular recordings that the precise timing of nonselective inputs creates selectivity for FM direction and velocity (Andoni S, Li N, Pollak GD. J Neurosci 27: 4882-4893, 2007; Fuzessery ZM, Richardson MD, Coburn MS. J Neurophysiol 96: 1320-1336, 2006; Gordon M, O'Neill WE. Hear Res 122: 97-108, 1998). We recently reported that two additional mechanisms were more important than input timing for directional selectivity in some IC cells: spike threshold and inputs that were already selective (Gittelman JX, Li N, Pollak GD. J Neurosci 29: 13030-13041, 2009). Here, we show that these same mechanisms, selective inputs and spike threshold, underlie selectivity for FM velocity and intensity. From whole cell recordings in awake bats, we recorded spikes and postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) evoked by downward and upward FMs that swept identical frequencies at different velocities and intensities. To determine the synaptic mechanisms underlying PSP selectivity (relative PSP height), we derived sweep-evoked synaptic conductances. Changing FM velocity or intensity changed conductance timing and size. Modeling indicated that excitatory conductance size contributed more to PSP selectivity than conductance timing, indicating that the number of afferent spikes carried more FM information to the IC than precise spike timing. However, excitation alone produced mostly suprathreshold PSPs. Inhibition reduced absolute PSP heights, without necessarily altering PSP selectivity, thereby rendering some PSPs subthreshold. Spike threshold then sharpened selectivity in the spikes by rectifying the smaller PSPs. This indicates the importance of spike threshold, and that inhibition enhances selectivity via a different mechanism than previously proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21813749      PMCID: PMC3214122          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00250.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  39 in total

1.  Distinct K currents result in physiologically distinct cell types in the inferior colliculus of the rat.

Authors:  S Sivaramakrishnan; D L Oliver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Topography and synaptic shaping of direction selectivity in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Li I Zhang; Andrew Y Y Tan; Christoph E Schreiner; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in the inferior colliculus: distribution and contribution to temporal processing.

Authors:  Ursula Koch; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Structure and function of cochlear afferent innervation.

Authors:  Alexander C Meyer; Tobias Moser
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Detailed passive cable models of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in rat visual cortex at different temperatures.

Authors:  Andrew J Trevelyan; Julian Jack
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  GABAA inhibition controls response gain in visual cortex.

Authors:  Steffen Katzner; Laura Busse; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Dynamic receptive fields of reconstructed pyramidal cells in layers 3 and 2 of rat somatosensory barrel cortex.

Authors:  Michael Brecht; Arnd Roth; Bert Sakmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Mechanisms underlying directional selectivity for frequency-modulated sweeps in the inferior colliculus revealed by in vivo whole-cell recordings.

Authors:  Joshua X Gittelman; Na Li; George D Pollak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sex-dependent hemispheric asymmetries for processing frequency-modulated sounds in the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

Authors:  Stuart D Washington; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Asymmetric temporal interactions of sound-evoked excitatory and inhibitory inputs in the mouse auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Munenori Ono; Douglas L Oliver
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  The dominant role of inhibition in creating response selectivities for communication calls in the brainstem auditory system.

Authors:  George D Pollak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  How auditory selectivity for sound timing arises: The diverse roles of GABAergic inhibition in shaping the excitation to interval-selective midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Rishi K Alluri; Gary J Rose; Christopher J Leary; Anil Palaparthi; Jessica L Hanson; Gustavo A Vasquez-Opazo; Jalina A Graham; Kyphuong Luong
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Inhibition shapes response selectivity in the inferior colliculus by gain modulation.

Authors:  Joshua X Gittelman; Le Wang; H S Colburn; George D Pollak
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Tonotopic and non-auditory organization of the mouse dorsal inferior colliculus revealed by two-photon imaging.

Authors:  Aaron Benson Wong; J Gerard G Borst
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Neural modelling of the encoding of fast frequency modulation.

Authors:  Alejandro Tabas; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  5-HT1A Receptors Alter Temporal Responses to Broadband Vocalizations in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus Through Response Suppression.

Authors:  Arianna Gentile Polese; Sunny Nigam; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Intracellular responses to frequency modulated tones in the dorsal cortex of the mouse inferior colliculus.

Authors:  H-Rüdiger A P Geis; J Gerard G Borst
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Multiple mechanisms shape FM sweep rate selectivity: complementary or redundant?

Authors:  Anthony J Williams; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.492

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.