Literature DB >> 23229443

Neural evidence supports a novel framework for spatial navigation.

Elizabeth R Chrastil1.   

Abstract

The spatial knowledge used for human navigation has traditionally been separated into three categories: landmark, route, and survey knowledge. While behavioral research has retained this framework, it has become increasingly clear from recent neuroimaging studies that such a classification system is not adequate for understanding the brain. This review proposes a new framework, with a taxonomy based on the cognitive processes and subprocesses involved in spatial navigation. The neural correlates of spatial memory can inform our understanding of the cognitive processes involved in human navigation, and conversely, the specific task demands of an experiment can inform the interpretation of neuroimaging results. This review examines the neural correlates of each cognitive process separately, to provide a closer inspection of each component of spatial navigation. While landmark, route, and survey knowledge are still important components of human navigation, the neural correlates are not neatly ascribed to these three categories. The present findings provide motivation for a more detailed examination of the cognitive processes engaged during wayfinding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23229443     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0351-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  128 in total

Review 1.  Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Mental navigation in humans is processed in the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus.

Authors:  Tadashi Ino; Yumiko Inoue; Masato Kage; Syuichi Hirose; Tooru Kimura; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Marianne Fyhn; Torkel Hafting; Alessandro Treves; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  An FMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Haline E Schendan; Meghan M Searl; Rebecca J Melrose; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world.

Authors:  Hugo J Spiers; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Dissociable neural circuits for encoding and retrieval of object locations during active navigation in humans.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Edgar Chan; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception.

Authors:  Soojin Park; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans.

Authors:  Tom Hartley; Chris M Bird; Dennis Chan; Lisa Cipolotti; Masud Husain; Faraneh Vargha-Khadem; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Keeping the goal in mind: prefrontal contributions to spatial navigation.

Authors:  Hugo J Spiers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  22 in total

1.  Real world navigation independence in the early blind correlates with differential brain activity associated with virtual navigation.

Authors:  Mark A Halko; Erin C Connors; Jaime Sánchez; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional correlates of likelihood and prior representations in a virtual distance task.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Kelly Michaelis; James C Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Behavior at the choice point: decision making in hidden pathway maze learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth Thomas; Peter J Snyder; Robert H Pietrzak; Paul Maruff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Different "routes" to a cognitive map: dissociable forms of spatial knowledge derived from route and cartographic map learning.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Ksenia Zherdeva; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

5.  Which way and how far? Tracking of translation and rotation information for human path integration.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; Katherine R Sherrill; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neural systems for landmark-based wayfinding in humans.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Lindsay K Vass
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Age-Related Changes in Spatial Navigation Are Evident by Midlife and Differ by Sex.

Authors:  Shuying Yu; Alexander P Boone; Chuanxiuyue He; Rie C Davis; Mary Hegarty; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Emily G Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05

8.  Functional connections between optic flow areas and navigationally responsive brain regions during goal-directed navigation.

Authors:  Katherine R Sherrill; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Robert S Ross; Uğur M Erdem; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 7.400

9.  There and Back Again: Hippocampus and Retrosplenial Cortex Track Homing Distance during Human Path Integration.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; Katherine R Sherrill; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  On the absence or presence of 3D tuned head direction cells in rats: a review and rebuttal.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Taube; Michael E Shinder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.