Literature DB >> 21813219

Risk, significance and biomedicalisation of a new population: older women's experience of osteoporosis screening.

Charlotte Ingrid Salter1, Amanda Howe, Lisa McDaid, Jeanette Blacklock, Elizabeth Lenaghan, Lee Shepstone.   

Abstract

This article explores the illness experience associated with being diagnosed at risk of a long term chronic condition and discusses the implications of an emergent form of predictive medicine. We report on findings from a study involving 30 older women between the ages of 73-85 years of age recently screened for osteoporosis and informed that they are at a higher than average risk of breaking a bone in the next 10 years, but not formally diagnosed with osteoporosis. Data were gathered by the Adherence to Osteoporosis Medicine (ATOM) study using in-depth interviews with women in their own homes in Norfolk & Suffolk, UK in 2009-2010. We analyse and discuss the significance participants give to their new fracture risk status and consider the practical, physical and existential consequences of this 'diagnosis'. The findings are discussed under three broad themes: Predictive technology, meaning and the risk-of-illness experience; knowledge, understanding and the embodiment of fracture risk status; and, social implications of biomedicine for an ageing population. We argue that screening for osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk can be understood as a process of biomedicalisation of ageing and bone health. This article offers insight into the meaning of risk status as an illness experience for older women. We conclude by discussing how biomedicalisation of a new population through diagnosis of fracture risk status has significance and consequence at both the individual and the societal level expanding the population of older women labelled at risk and increasing demand for biomedical tests and prescribed medication for the prevention of disease.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21813219     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

Review 1.  The psychological harms of screening: the evidence we have versus the evidence we need.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Colleen Barclay; Stacey Sheridan; Noel T Brewer; Meredith Gilliam; Andrew M Moon; William Rearick; Carolyn Ziemer; Russell Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Systematic screening using FRAX® leads to increased use of, and adherence to, anti-osteoporosis medications: an analysis of the UK SCOOP trial.

Authors:  C M Parsons; N Harvey; L Shepstone; J A Kanis; E Lenaghan; S Clarke; R Fordham; N Gittoes; I Harvey; R Holland; N M Redmond; A Howe; T Marshall; T J Peters; D Torgerson; T W O'Neill; E McCloskey; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Diagnosis, narrative identity, and asymptomatic disease.

Authors:  Mary Jean Walker; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2017-08

4.  Gaining control over breast cancer risk: Transforming vulnerability, uncertainty, and the future through clinical trial participation - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Katie Whitehouse; Mary Daly; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-08-03

5.  Abandoned acid? Understanding adherence to bisphosphonate medications for the prevention of osteoporosis among older women: a qualitative longitudinal study.

Authors:  Charlotte Salter; Lisa McDaid; Debi Bhattacharya; Richard Holland; Tarnya Marshall; Amanda Howe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transient ischaemic attack: a qualitative study of the long term consequences for patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Croot; Tony W Ryan; Jennifer Read; Fiona Campbell; Alicia O'Cathain; Graham Venables
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Corporal diagnostic work and diagnostic spaces: clinicians' use of space and bodies during diagnosis.

Authors:  John Gardner; Clare Williams
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-02-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.