Literature DB >> 21812896

Long-term quality of life in pouch patients compared with stoma patients following rectal cancer surgery.

K Mrak1, M Jagoditsch, T Eberl, A Klingler, J Tschmelitsch.   

Abstract

AIM: Low and ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis does not compromise oncological results compared with abdominoperineal excision. Although avoidance of a permanent colostomy is regarded as beneficial for a patient's quality of life (QoL), patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery may develop a number of functional problems. A colonic pouch significantly improves functional outcome after rectal resection and low anastomosis and may positively influence QoL. The aim of this study was to compare QoL in long-term survivors who underwent ultralow anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and colonic J-pouch anastomosis (CPA) with patients treated with abdominoperineal excision (APE) and end colostomy for rectal cancer.
METHOD: The medical records from our institution's prospectively maintained rectal cancer database of 151 patients who underwent surgery for ultralow rectal cancer from 2001 to 2007 were analysed. QoL in 59 eligible patients was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 core and Colorectal Cancer 29. Results were compared for patients with CPA and APE.
RESULTS: The median follow-up in the 59 patients was 74 (37-119) months. QoL was good in all patients, but it was better in CPA than in APE patients. Global health status (P = 0.009), physical functioning (P = 0.0002), role functioning (P = 0.03), cognitive functioning (P = 0.046), social functioning (P = 0.002), body image (P = 0.053), embarrassment (P = 0.002) and urinary frequency (P = 0.003) were significantly improved for patients with CPA.
CONCLUSION: QoL after rectal resection and CPA was better than after APE in several respects. However, QoL should not be regarded as an isolated concept but rather as one of several possible clinical outcomes of interest.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21812896     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02740.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  4 in total

1.  Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Andrea Altschuler; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Diverting ileostomy itself may not increase the rate of postoperative readmission related to dehydration after low anterior resection.

Authors:  Sung Sil Park; Min Jung Kim; Dong-Eun Lee; Sung Chan Park; Kyung Su Han; Chang Won Hong; Dae Kyung Sohn; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.859

3.  Does temporary ileostomy via specimen extraction site affect the short outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Dong Peng; Dong-Ling Yu; Xiao-Yu Liu; Wei Tao; Bing Kang; Hua Zhang; Zheng-Qiang Wei; Guang-Yan Ji
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.030

4.  Quality of life in restorative versus non-restorative resections for rectal cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Lawday; Nicholas Flamey; George E Fowler; Matthew Leaning; Nadine Dyar; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart; Christopher Hyde
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.