Literature DB >> 21812556

Different brain activities predict retrieval success during emotional and semantic encoding.

Tullia Padovani1, Thomas Koenig, Daniel Brandeis, Walter J Perrig.   

Abstract

There is an increasing line of evidence supporting the idea that the formation of lasting memories involves neural activity preceding stimulus presentation. Following this line, we presented words in an incidental learning setting and manipulated the prestimulus state by asking the participants to perform either an emotional (neutral or emotional) or a semantic (animate or inanimate) decision task. Later, we tested the retrieval of each previously presented word with a recognition memory test. For both conditions, the subsequent memory effect (SME) was defined as ERP difference between subsequently remembered and forgotten words. Comparing the prestimulus SME between and within the two conditions yielded topographic differences in the time interval from -1300 to -700 msec before stimulus onset. This indicates that the activity of brain areas involved in incidental encoding of semantic information varied in the spatial distribution of ERPs, depending on the emotional and semantic requirements of the task. These findings provide evidence that there is a difference in semantic and emotional preparatory processes, which modulates successful encoding into episodic memory. This difference suggests that there are multiple task-specific functional neural systems that support memory formation. These systems differ in location and/or relative contribution of some of the brain structures that generate the measured scalp electric fields. Consequently, the cognitive processes that enable memory formation depend on the differential semantic nature of the study task and reflect differences in the preparatory processing of the multiple semantic components of a word's meaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21812556     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Prestimulus default mode activity influences depth of processing and recognition in an emotional memory task.

Authors:  Leila M Soravia; Joëlle S Witmer; Simon Schwab; Masahito Nakataki; Thomas Dierks; Roland Wiest; Katharina Henke; Andrea Federspiel; Kay Jann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Preparing for the Worst: Evidence that Older Adults Proactively Downregulate Negative Affect.

Authors:  Brittany Corbett; M Natasha Rajah; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Age-related Differences in Prestimulus Subsequent Memory Effects Assessed with Event-related Potentials.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Erin D Horne; Nedra Hauck; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of Age on Prestimulus Neural Activity Predictive of Successful Memory Encoding: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  E Song Liu; Joshua D Koen; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Sustained and transient attentional processes modulate neural predictors of memory encoding in consecutive time periods.

Authors:  Tullia Padovani; Thomas Koenig; Doris Eckstein; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  ERP Correlates of Encoding Success and Encoding Selectivity in Attention Switching.

Authors:  Franziska R Richter; Nick Yeung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expected reward modulates encoding-related theta activity before an event.

Authors:  Matthias J Gruber; Andrew J Watrous; Arne D Ekstrom; Charan Ranganath; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Available processing resources influence encoding-related brain activity before an event.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; A Dorothea Gebert; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Prestimulus brain activity predicts primacy in list learning.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; Tsee Leng Choy; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.065

10.  Emotion regulation modulates anticipatory brain activity that predicts emotional memory encoding in women.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; Victoria A Griffiths; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.