Literature DB >> 21811821

Evaluation of the in vitro cell-material interactions and in vivo osteo-integration of a spinal acrylic bone cement.

Sophie Verrier1, Lisa Hughes, Antoine Alves, Marianna Peroglio, Mauro Alini, Andreas Boger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Polymethylmethacrylate bone cements have proven performance in arthroplasty and represent a common bone filler, e.g. in vertebroplasty. However, acrylic cements are still subject to controversy concerning their exothermic reaction and osteo-integration potential. Therefore, we submitted a highly filled acrylic cement to a systematic investigation on the cell-material and tissue-implant response in vitro and in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cured Vertecem V+ Cements were characterized by electron microscopy. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell morphology, growth and differentiation on the cured cement were followed for 28 days in vitro. The uncured cement was injected in an ovine cancellous bone defect and analysed 4 and 26 weeks post-implantation.
RESULTS: The rough surface of the cement allowed for good stem cells adhesion in vitro. Up-regulation of alkaline phosphatase was detected after 8 days of incubation. No adverse local effects were observed macroscopically and microscopically following 4 and 26 weeks of implantation of the cement into drill-hole defects in ovine distal femoral epiphysis. Direct bone apposition onto the implant surface was observed resulting in extended signs of osteo-integration over time (35.2 ± 24.2% and 88.8 ± 8.8% at week 4 and 26, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Contrary to the established opinion concerning bony tissue response to implanted acrylic bone cements, we observed an early cell-implant in vitro interaction leading to cell growth and differentiation and significant signs of osteo-integration for this acrylic cement using standardized methods. Few outlined limitations, such as the use of low cement volumes, have to be considered in the interpretation of the study results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21811821      PMCID: PMC3535219          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1945-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  40 in total

1.  Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion.

Authors:  K Anselme; M Bigerelle
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Strontium-containing hydroxyapatite bioactive bone cement in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G X Ni; K Y Chiu; W W Lu; Y Wang; Y G Zhang; L B Hao; Z Y Li; W M Lam; S B Lu; K D K Luk
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review.

Authors:  A I Pearce; R G Richards; S Milz; E Schneider; S G Pearce
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Properties of an injectable low modulus PMMA bone cement for osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Andreas Boger; Marc Bohner; Paul Heini; Sophie Verrier; Erich Schneider
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  S Becker; A Chavanne; R Spitaler; K Kropik; N Aigner; M Ogon; H Redl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Early histologic changes following polymethylmethacrylate injection (vertebroplasty) in rabbit lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Christopher M Bono; Pablo Mery; Claudio Rojas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Cardiovascular changes after pulmonary cement embolism: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  J Krebs; N Aebli; B G Goss; K Wilson; R Williams; S J Ferguson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Long-term reaction to bone cement in osteoporotic bone: new bone formation in vertebral bodies after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Volker Braunstein; Christoph M Sprecher; Armando Gisep; Lorin Benneker; Kathrin Yen; Erich Schneider; Paul Heini; Stefan Milz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Osteoblast differentiation onto different biometals with an endoprosthetic surface topography in vitro.

Authors:  M Jäger; F Urselmann; F Witte; K Zanger; X Li; D C Ayers; R Krauspe
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  [Indications and results of kypho- and vertebroplasty].

Authors:  C Kasperk; G Nöldge; I Grafe; P Meeder; F Huber; P Nawroth
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.743

View more
  3 in total

1.  Polymethyl methacrylate does not adversely affect the osteogenic potential of human adipose stem cells or primary osteoblasts.

Authors:  Angela P Bastidas-Coral; Astrid D Bakker; Cornelis J Kleverlaan; Jolanda M A Hogervorst; Jenneke Klein-Nulend; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  Engineering Stem Cell Recruitment and Osteoinduction via Bioadhesive Molecular Mimics to Improve Osteoporotic Bone-Implant Integration.

Authors:  Jiaxiang Bai; Gaoran Ge; Qing Wang; Wenming Li; Kai Zheng; Yaozeng Xu; Huilin Yang; Guoqing Pan; Dechun Geng
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-09-06

3.  Biomechanical Comparison of Pull-out Strength of Different Cementation and Pedicle Screw Placement Techniques in a Calf Spine Model.

Authors:  Turgut Akgül; Murat Korkmaz; Tuna Pehlivanoglu; Serkan Bayram; Mustafa Abdullah Özdemir; Şahin Karalar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.