Literature DB >> 21811804

A meta-analytic approach to estimating nocebo effects in neuropathic pain trials.

Dimitrios Papadopoulos1, Dimos Dimitrios Mitsikostas.   

Abstract

The development of non-specific adverse effects following the administration of an active or inert substance is referred to as nocebo phenomenon. We aimed to estimate the frequency and severity of nocebo responses in clinical trials of pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain. A systematic Medline search for all randomized, placebo-controlled neuropathic pain trials published between 2000 and 2010 was carried out. Meta-analysis of the frequency of nocebo responses was performed by pooling the percentage of placebo-treated patients that exhibited drug-related adverse events. Nocebo severity was calculated from the percentage of placebo-treated patients that dropped out due to drug-related adverse events. The pooled frequency of nocebo responses in neuropathic pain trials was 52.0% (95% CI: 35.7-67.9) and the pooled nocebo severity was 6.0% (95% CI: 4.5-8.0). Meta-regression analysis revealed an association between the frequency of nocebo responses and the percentage of females in the placebo-treated group (p = 0.0028). Furthermore, nocebo severity displayed a significant association with the study population (p = 0.0386). Our data indicates a powerful nocebo effect in neuropathic pain trials that may be influenced by gender- and population-related factors. A strong nocebo effect may be adversely affecting adherence and efficacy of current treatments for neuropathic pain in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21811804     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-6197-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  50 in total

1.  Expectation of pain enhances responses to nonpainful somatosensory stimulation in the anterior cingulate cortex and parietal operculum/posterior insula: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  N Sawamoto; M Honda; T Okada; T Hanakawa; M Kanda; H Fukuyama; J Konishi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Drug-related information generates placebo and nocebo responses that modify the drug response.

Authors:  M A Flaten; T Simonsen; H Olsen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

Authors:  J F Wernicke; Y L Pritchett; D N D'Souza; A Waninger; P Tran; S Iyengar; J Raskin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Placebo effects in oral triptan trials: the scientific and ethical rationale for continued use of placebo controls.

Authors:  E Loder; R Goldstein; D Biondi
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.292

5.  Venlafaxine versus imipramine in painful polyneuropathy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  S H Sindrup; F W Bach; C Madsen; L F Gram; T S Jensen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Efficacy of pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: an update and effect related to mechanism of drug action.

Authors:  Søren H Sindrup; Troels S Jensen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Efficacy of lamotrigine in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, N01C3.

Authors:  Ravi D Rao; Patrick J Flynn; Jeff A Sloan; Gilbert Y Wong; Paul Novotny; David B Johnson; Howard M Gross; Samer I Renno; Mohammed Nashawaty; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Epidemiology and treatment of neuropathic pain: the UK primary care perspective.

Authors:  Gillian C Hall; Dawn Carroll; David Parry; Henry J McQuay
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Evaluation of the nocebo effect during oral challenge in patients with adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  G Liccardi; G Senna; M Russo; P Bonadonna; M Crivellaro; A Dama; M D'Amato; G D'Amato; G W Canonica; G Passalacqua
Journal:  J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  The impact of neuropathic pain on health-related quality of life: review and implications.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Marci J Chodroff; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Nocebo in headaches: implications for clinical practice and trial design.

Authors:  Dimos D Mitsikostas
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  [Gender differences in acute and chronic pain conditions. Implications for diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  M Schopper; J Fleckenstein; D Irnich
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 3.  Characterization of the adverse events profile of placebo-treated patients in randomized controlled trials on drug-resistant focal epilepsies.

Authors:  Fabio Giovannelli; Gaetano Zaccara; Massimo Cincotta; Giulia Loiacono; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Nocebo and the contribution of psychosocial factors to the generation of pain.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Elisa Frisaldi; Diletta Barbiani; Eleonora Camerone; Aziz Shaibani
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Adverse events of placebo-treated, drug-resistant, focal epileptic patients in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gaetano Zaccara; Fabio Giovannelli; Massimo Cincotta; Giulia Loiacono; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Placebo, nocebo, and neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Ina Skyt; Kathryn T Hall
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 7.  Nonspecific adverse events in knee osteoarthritis clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yun Hyung Koog; Jin Su Lee; Hyungsun Wi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Treatment Outcomes with Biosimilars: Be Aware of the Nocebo Effect.

Authors:  Mourad F Rezk; Burkhard Pieper
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2017-10-14

9.  The nocebo effect of drugs.

Authors:  Sara Planès; Céline Villier; Michel Mallaret
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2016-03-17

Review 10.  Minimizing nocebo effect: Pragmatic approach.

Authors:  Majed Chamsi-Pasha; Mohammed Ali Albar; Hassan Chamsi-Pasha
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.