PURPOSE: Altered kinematics following ACL-reconstruction may be a cause of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. T(1ρ) MRI is a technique that detects early cartilage matrix degeneration. Our study aimed to evaluate kinematics following ACL-reconstruction, cartilage health (using T(1ρ) MRI), and assess whether altered kinematics following ACL-reconstruction are associated with early cartilage degeneration. METHODS: Eleven patients (average age: 33 ± 9 years) underwent 3T MRI 18 ± 5 months following ACL-reconstruction. Images were obtained at extension and 30° flexion under simulated loading (125 N). Tibial rotation (TR) and anterior tibial translation (ATT) between flexion and extension, and T(1ρ) relaxation times of the knee cartilage were analyzed. Cartilage was divided into five compartments: medial and lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC), medial and lateral tibias (MT/LT), and patella. A sub-analysis of the femoral weight-bearing (wb) regions was also performed. Patients were categorized as having "abnormal" or "restored" ATT and TR, and T(1ρ) percentage increase was compared between these two groups of patients. RESULTS: As a group, there were no significant differences between ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knee kinematics, however, there were individual variations. T(1ρ) relaxation times of the MFC and MFC-wb region were elevated (p ≤ 0.05) in the ACL-reconstructed knees compared to the uninjured contralateral knees. There were increases (p ≤ 0.05) in the MFC-wb, MT, patella and overall average cartilage T(1ρ) values of the "abnormal" ATT group compared to "restored" ATT group. The percentage increase in the T(1ρ) relaxation time in the MFC-wb cartilage approached significance (p=0.08) in the "abnormal" versus "restored" TR patients. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal kinematics following ACL-reconstruction appear to lead to cartilage degeneration, particularly in the medial compartment.
PURPOSE: Altered kinematics following ACL-reconstruction may be a cause of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. T(1ρ) MRI is a technique that detects early cartilage matrix degeneration. Our study aimed to evaluate kinematics following ACL-reconstruction, cartilage health (using T(1ρ) MRI), and assess whether altered kinematics following ACL-reconstruction are associated with early cartilage degeneration. METHODS: Eleven patients (average age: 33 ± 9 years) underwent 3T MRI 18 ± 5 months following ACL-reconstruction. Images were obtained at extension and 30° flexion under simulated loading (125 N). Tibial rotation (TR) and anterior tibial translation (ATT) between flexion and extension, and T(1ρ) relaxation times of the knee cartilage were analyzed. Cartilage was divided into five compartments: medial and lateral femoral condyles (MFC/LFC), medial and lateral tibias (MT/LT), and patella. A sub-analysis of the femoral weight-bearing (wb) regions was also performed. Patients were categorized as having "abnormal" or "restored" ATT and TR, and T(1ρ) percentage increase was compared between these two groups of patients. RESULTS: As a group, there were no significant differences between ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knee kinematics, however, there were individual variations. T(1ρ) relaxation times of the MFC and MFC-wb region were elevated (p ≤ 0.05) in the ACL-reconstructed knees compared to the uninjured contralateral knees. There were increases (p ≤ 0.05) in the MFC-wb, MT, patella and overall average cartilage T(1ρ) values of the "abnormal" ATT group compared to "restored" ATT group. The percentage increase in the T(1ρ) relaxation time in the MFC-wb cartilage approached significance (p=0.08) in the "abnormal" versus "restored" TR patients. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal kinematics following ACL-reconstruction appear to lead to cartilage degeneration, particularly in the medial compartment.
Authors: Sveinbjörn Brandsson; Jon Karlsson; Leif Swärd; Jüri Kartus; Bengt I Eriksson; Johan Kärrholm Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Annegret Mündermann; Chris O Dyrby; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Thomas P Andriacchi Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Guoan Li; Jeremy M Moses; Ramprasad Papannagari; Neil P Pathare; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: X Li; C Benjamin Ma; T M Link; D-D Castillo; G Blumenkrantz; J Lozano; J Carballido-Gamio; M Ries; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Musa Zaid; Drew Lansdown; Favian Su; Valentina Pedoia; Lauren Tufts; Sarah Rizzo; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Kenneth L Cameron; Kevin R Ford; Dustin R Grooms; Lindsey K Lepley; Gregory D Myer; Brian Pietrosimone Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Matthew P Ithurburn; Andrew M Zbojniewicz; Staci Thomas; Kevin D Evans; Michael L Pennell; Robert A Magnussen; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Eziamaka C Okafor; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Margaret R Widmyer; Ermias S Abebe; Amber T Collins; Dean C Taylor; Charles E Spritzer; C T Moorman; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 2.712