Literature DB >> 21806490

Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.

Elad Mei-Dan1, Asnat Walfisch, Sivan Suarez-Easton, Mordechai Hallak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion and the Cook cervical ripening balloon.
METHODS: Women at term with a singleton pregnancy who presented for labor induction were randomly assigned to the Foley catheter or the Cook cervical ripening balloon (costs $3 and $41, respectively). The main outcome measures included time from device insertion to delivery, rates of successful vaginal delivery and occurrence of adverse events.
RESULTS: The study was completed by 188 women. Time from balloon insertion to expulsion and from insertion to delivery was significantly shorter in the Foley catheter group when compared with the Cook cervical ripening balloon group (6.9 ± 4.2 vs. 10.1 ± 4.7 hours, p = .001 and 19.6 ± 11.4 vs. 23.4 ± 15.5 hours, p = .03, respectively). There were no significant differences in other outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering its shorter induction process and lower cost, Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion is superior to the Cook cervical ripening balloon for initiating cervical ripening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21806490     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.591459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

Authors:  W Rath; S Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  A snapshot of women's and clinicians' perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor.

Authors:  Sarah Waldron; Hannah Contziu; Olga Aleshin; Hala Phipps
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  A lariat-based dilatation device for hysteroscopy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Donghua Shen; Kaiwei Ma; Mengqian Tian; Lan Li; Qing Jiang; Xingsong Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  A simplified cervix model in response to induction balloon in pre-labour.

Authors:  James Andrew Smith
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 5.  Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiyao Liu; Yu Wang; Fan Zhang; Xiaoni Zhong; Rong Ou; Xin Luo; Hongbo Qi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix-- in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Soe-Na Choo; Abhiram Kanneganti; Muhammad Nur Dinie Bin Abdul Aziz; Leta Loh; Carol Hargreaves; Vikneswaran Gopal; Arijit Biswas; Yiong Huak Chan; Ida Suzani Ismail; Claudia Chi; Citra Mattar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.