Literature DB >> 21803584

The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees.

David C Morgenroth1, Ava D Segal, Karl E Zelik, Joseph M Czerniecki, Glenn K Klute, Peter G Adamczyk, Michael S Orendurff, Michael E Hahn, Steven H Collins, Art D Kuo.   

Abstract

Lower extremity amputation not only limits mobility, but also increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis of the intact limb. Dynamic walking models of non-amputees suggest that pushing-off from the trailing limb can reduce collision forces on the leading limb. These collision forces may determine the peak knee external adduction moment (EAM), which has been linked to the development of knee OA in the general population. We therefore hypothesized that greater prosthetic push-off would lead to reduced loading and knee EAM of the intact limb in unilateral transtibial amputees. Seven unilateral transtibial amputees were studied during gait under three prosthetic foot conditions that were intended to vary push-off. Prosthetic foot-ankle push-off work, intact limb knee EAM and ground reaction impulses for both limbs during step-to-step transition were measured. Overall, trailing limb prosthetic push-off work was negatively correlated with leading intact limb 1st peak knee EAM (slope=-.72±.22; p=.011). Prosthetic push-off work and 1st peak intact knee EAM varied significantly with foot type. The prosthetic foot condition with the least push-off demonstrated the largest knee EAM, which was reduced by 26% with the prosthetic foot producing the most push-off. Trailing prosthetic limb push-off impulse was negatively correlated with leading intact limb loading impulse (slope=-.34±.14; p=.001), which may help explain how prosthetic limb push-off can affect intact limb loading. Prosthetic feet that perform more prosthetic push-off appear to be associated with a reduction in 1st peak intact knee EAM, and their use could potentially reduce the risk and burden of knee osteoarthritis in this population. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21803584      PMCID: PMC3189331          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  31 in total

1.  Estimates of mechanical work and energy transfers: demonstration of a rigid body power model of the recovery leg in gait.

Authors:  G E Caldwell; L W Forrester
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study.

Authors:  L Torburn; J Perry; E Ayyappa; S L Shanfield
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1990

3.  Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking.

Authors:  A Gitter; J M Czerniecki; D M DeGroot
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Accelerographic, temporal, and distance gait factors in below-knee amputees.

Authors:  J L Robinson; G L Smidt; J S Arora
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1977-08

5.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

6.  Mechanical energy generation, absorption and transfer amongst segments during walking.

Authors:  D G Robertson; D A Winter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Dynamics of knee malalignment.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Relationships among bone mineral densities, static alignment and dynamic load in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M Wada; Y Maezawa; H Baba; S Shimada; S Sasaki; Y Nose
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Osteoarthritis and elderly amputee gait.

Authors:  E D Lemaire; F R Fisher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking.

Authors:  O D Schipplein; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  28 in total

1.  Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Michelle Roland; Michael E Hahn
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 2.  Impact of Traumatic Lower Extremity Injuries Beyond Acute Care: Movement-Based Considerations for Resultant Longer Term Secondary Health Conditions.

Authors:  Courtney M Butowicz; Christopher L Dearth; Brad D Hendershot
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  The pathophysiology of osteoarthritis: a mechanical perspective on the knee joint.

Authors:  Kevin R Vincent; Bryan P Conrad; Benjamin J Fregly; Heather K Vincent
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Two biomechanical strategies for locomotor adaptation to split-belt treadmill walking in subjects with and without transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Brian P Selgrade; Megan E Toney; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Trunk kinetic effort during step ascent and descent in patients with transtibial amputation using angular momentum separation.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 6.  Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Eric C Honert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Does intact limb loading differ in servicemembers with traumatic lower limb loss?

Authors:  Alison L Pruziner; Kathryn M Werner; Timothy J Copple; Brad D Hendershot; Erik J Wolf
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effects of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis on Amputee Hip Compensations: A Case Series.

Authors:  Toby Elery; Siavash Rezazadeh; Emma Reznick; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Mechanisms of Gait Asymmetry Due to Push-Off Deficiency in Unilateral Amputees.

Authors:  Peter Gabriel Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level-ground walking.

Authors:  Alena M Grabowski; Susan D'Andrea
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.