Literature DB >> 11371657

Relationships among bone mineral densities, static alignment and dynamic load in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

M Wada1, Y Maezawa, H Baba, S Shimada, S Sasaki, Y Nose.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationships among bone mineral density (BMD), static alignment and the adduction moment of the knee in patients with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with medial compartment knee OA underwent radiographic evaluation, gait analysis and BMD measurements at the proximal tibia and lumbar spine.
RESULTS: The bone mineral distribution of the medial to lateral part of the proximal tibia correlated significantly with the peak knee adduction moment and the mechanical axis. Furthermore, the adduction moment correlated significantly with the mechanical axis. However, the BMD of the lumbar spine and the bone mineral distribution of the posterior to anterior part of the proximal tibia did not correlate with any other measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the bone mineral distribution of the proximal tibia is directly affected but lumbar BMD is not influenced by the local mechanical stress around the knee with medial compartment OA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11371657     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.5.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  38 in total

1.  Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; M Wada; H Kawahara; M Sato; H Baba; S Shimada
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Abnormal biomechanics: a precursor or result of knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  A Teichtahl; A Wluka; F M Cicuttini
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Does total knee arthroplasty change frontal plane knee biomechanics during gait?

Authors:  Karl F Orishimo; Ian J Kremenic; Ajit J Deshmukh; Stephen J Nicholas; Jose A Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cross-sectional DXA and MR measures of tibial periarticular bone associate with radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity.

Authors:  G H Lo; A M Tassinari; J B Driban; L L Price; E Schneider; S Majumdar; T E McAlindon
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Strategies used during a challenging weighted walking task in healthy adults and individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Andrew J Kubinski; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  A comparison of conventional maximum intensity projection with a new depth-specific topographic mapping technique in the CT analysis of proximal tibial subchondral bone density.

Authors:  James D Johnston; Saija A Kontulainen; Bassam A Masri; David R Wilson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Meniscal damage associated with increased local subchondral bone mineral density: a Framingham study.

Authors:  G H Lo; J Niu; C E McLennan; D P Kiel; R R McLean; A Guermazi; H K Genant; T E McAlindon; D J Hunter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 8.  Conservative biomechanical strategies for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Neil D Reeves; Frank L Bowling
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  Acute Effects of Foot Rotation in Healthy Adults during Running on Knee Moments and Lateral-Medial Shear Force.

Authors:  Kevin A Valenzuela; Scott K Lynn; Guillermo J Noffal; Lee E Brown
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Control of frontal plane knee laxity during gait in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Michael D Lewek; Katherine S Rudolph; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.