OBJECTIVE: Medication administration errors (MAEs) are the second most frequent type of medication errors, as has been shown in different studies in the literature. The aims of this observational study were to assess the rate and the potential clinical significance of MAEs and to determine the associated risk factors. DESIGN: In two departments, Geriatric Unit (GU) and Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery Unit (CTSU) of Besançon University Hospital (France), MAEs were identified using the undisguised observation technique and classified according to the definitions of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Injectable administration, lack of nurses's standardized protocol for the preparation and administration of drugs, incomplete or illegible prescription and nurse's workload were analysed as potential risk factors of MAEs in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During a period of 20 days, opportunities for error concerning 56 patients and 78 MAEs (58 in CTSU and 26 in GU) were observed. The medication administration error rate was 14.9%. Dose errors were the most frequent (41%) errors, followed by wrong time (26%) and wrong rate errors (1996). No potential fatal errors were observed, 8 (10%) were estimated as potentially life-threatening, 20 (26%) potentially significant and 50 (64%) potentially minor. Nurse workload and incomplete or illegible prescriptions were two independent risk factors of MAEs. CONCLUSION: According to these data, the quality of the medication administration process needs to be optimized in hospitals in order to minimize the incidence of iatrogenic preventable diseases.
OBJECTIVE: Medication administration errors (MAEs) are the second most frequent type of medication errors, as has been shown in different studies in the literature. The aims of this observational study were to assess the rate and the potential clinical significance of MAEs and to determine the associated risk factors. DESIGN: In two departments, Geriatric Unit (GU) and Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery Unit (CTSU) of Besançon University Hospital (France), MAEs were identified using the undisguised observation technique and classified according to the definitions of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Injectable administration, lack of nurses's standardized protocol for the preparation and administration of drugs, incomplete or illegible prescription and nurse's workload were analysed as potential risk factors of MAEs in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During a period of 20 days, opportunities for error concerning 56 patients and 78 MAEs (58 in CTSU and 26 in GU) were observed. The medication administration error rate was 14.9%. Dose errors were the most frequent (41%) errors, followed by wrong time (26%) and wrong rate errors (1996). No potential fatal errors were observed, 8 (10%) were estimated as potentially life-threatening, 20 (26%) potentially significant and 50 (64%) potentially minor. Nurse workload and incomplete or illegible prescriptions were two independent risk factors of MAEs. CONCLUSION: According to these data, the quality of the medication administration process needs to be optimized in hospitals in order to minimize the incidence of iatrogenic preventable diseases.
Authors: D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D W Bates; J M Teich; J Lee; D Seger; G J Kuperman; N Ma'Luf; D Boyle; L Leape Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 1999 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: L L Leape; D W Bates; D J Cullen; J Cooper; H J Demonaco; T Gallivan; R Hallisey; J Ives; N Laird; G Laffel Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thilo Bertsche; Dorothee Niemann; Yvonne Mayer; Katrin Ingram; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Pharm World Sci Date: 2008-09-12
Authors: Anita Krähenbühl-Melcher; Raymond Schlienger; Markus Lampert; Manuel Haschke; Jürgen Drewe; Stephan Krähenbühl Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Rebecca Lawton; Rosemary R C McEachan; Sally J Giles; Reema Sirriyeh; Ian S Watt; John Wright Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 7.035