Literature DB >> 21802687

Detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by 64-slice multidetector CT: a systematic head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

Stella-Lida Papadopoulou1, Lisan A Neefjes, Michiel Schaap, Hui-Ling Li, Ermanno Capuano, Alina G van der Giessen, Johan C H Schuurbiers, Frank J H Gijsen, Anoeshka S Dharampal, Koen Nieman, Robert Jan van Geuns, Nico R Mollet, Pim J de Feyter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the ability of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-derived plaque parameters to detect and quantify coronary atherosclerosis, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the reference standard.
METHODS: In 32 patients, IVUS and 64-MDCT was performed. The MDCT and IVUS datasets of 44 coronary arteries were co-registered using a newly developed fusion technique and quantitative parameters were derived from both imaging modalities. The threshold of >0.5 mm of maximum wall thickness was used to establish plaque presence on MDCT and IVUS.
RESULTS: We analyzed 1364 coregistered 1-mm coronary cross-sections and 255 segments of 5-mm length. Compared with IVUS, 64-MDCT enabled correct detection in 957 of 1109 cross-sections containing plaque (sensitivity 86%). In 180 of 255 cross-sections atherosclerosis was correctly excluded (specificity 71%). On the segmental level, MDCT detected 213 of 220 segments with any atherosclerotic plaque (sensitivity 96%), whereas the presence of any plaque was correctly ruled out in 28 of 32 segments (specificity 88%). Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic cross-sections was moderate (Cohen's kappa coefficient K=0.51), but excellent for the atherosclerotic segments (K=1.0). Pearson's correlation coefficient for vessel plaque volumes measured by MDCT and IVUS was r=0.91 (p<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a slight non-significant underestimation of any plaque volume by MDCT (p=0.5), with a trend to underestimate noncalcified and overestimate mixed/calcified plaque volumes (p=0.22 and p=0.87 respectively).
CONCLUSION: MDCT is able to detect and quantify atherosclerotic plaque. Further improvement in CT resolution is necessary for more reliable assessment of very small and distal coronary plaques. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21802687     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  23 in total

1.  Coronary artery plaque volume and obesity in patients with diabetes: the factor-64 study.

Authors:  Alan C Kwan; Heidi T May; George Cater; Christopher T Sibley; Boaz D Rosen; João A C Lima; Karen Rodriguez; Donald L Lappe; Joseph B Muhlestein; Jeffrey L Anderson; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quantification and characterisation of coronary artery plaque volume and adverse plaque features by coronary computed tomographic angiography: a direct comparison to intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Aryeh Shalev; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative Evaluation of Coronary Plaque Progression by Computed Tomographic Angiography.

Authors:  Xiujian Liu; Guanghui Wu; Chuangye Xu; Yuna He; Lixia Shu; Yuyang Liu; Nan Zhang; Changyan Lin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-10-01

4.  Gender differences in coronary plaque composition and burden detected in symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Waqas Qureshi; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Cardiac CT: atherosclerosis to acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Ravi Kiran Munnur; James D Cameron; Brian S Ko; Ian T Meredith; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

6.  Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis: results from the prospective multicentre FIGURE-OUT (Functional Imaging criteria for GUiding REview of invasive coronary angiOgraphy, intravascular Ultrasound, and coronary computed Tomographic angiography) study.

Authors:  Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Chang-Wook Nam; Ji-Hyun Kim; James K Min; Ryo Nakazato; Todung Silalahi; Hardjo Prawira; Hyunmin Choi; Sung Yun Lee; June Namgung; Sung Uk Kwon; Jae-Jin Kwak; Won Ro Lee
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Iron and atherosclerosis: nailing down a novel target with magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Travis P Sharkey-Toppen; Arun K Tewari; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Application of Non-invasive Imaging in Inflammatory Disease Conditions to Evaluate Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Harry Choi; Domingo E Uceda; Amit K Dey; Nehal N Mehta
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Prognostic value of coronary atherosclerosis progression evaluated by coronary CT angiography in patients with stable angina.

Authors:  Hui Gu; Yang Gao; Zhihui Hou; U Joseph Schoepf; Alan N Snyder; Taylor M Duguay; Ximing Wang; Bin Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Noninvasive and Invasive Assessments of the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis: Is This a Matter of Right or Wrong?

Authors:  Fan Yongzhen; Ki-Hyun Jeon; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.