Literature DB >> 18634906

Cell-type-specific consequences of nucleotide excision repair deficiencies: Embryonic stem cells versus fibroblasts.

Harm de Waard1, Edwin Sonneveld, Jan de Wit, Rebecca Esveldt-van Lange, Jan H J Hoeijmakers, Harry Vrieling, Gijsbertus T J van der Horst.   

Abstract

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ES cells) are the precursors of all different cell types comprising the organism. Since persistent DNA damage in this cell type might lead to mutations that cause huge malformations in the developing organism, genome caretaking is of prime importance. We first compared the sensitivity of wild type mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and ES cells for various genotoxic agents and show that ES cells are more sensitive to treatment with UV-light, gamma-rays and mitomycin C than MEFs. We next investigated the contribution of the transcription-coupled (TC-NER) and global genome (GG-NER) sub-pathways of nucleotide excision repair (NER) in protection of ES cells, using cells from mouse models for the NER disorders xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and Cockayne syndrome (CS). TC-NER-deficient Csb(-/-) and GG-NER/TC-NER-defective Xpa(-/-) MEFs are hypersensitive to UV, whereas GG-NER-deficient Xpc(-/-) MEFs attribute intermediate UV sensitivity. The observed UV-hypersensitivity in Csb(-/-) and Xpa(-/-) MEFs correlates with increased apoptosis. In contrast, Xpa(-/-) and Xpc(-/-) ES cells are highly UV-sensitive, while a Csb deficiency only causes a mild increase in UV-sensitivity. Surprisingly, a UV-induced hyperapoptotic response is mainly observed in Xpa(-/-) ES cells, suggesting a different mechanism of apoptosis induction in ES cells, mainly triggered by damage in the global genome rather than in transcribed genes (as in MEFs). Moreover, we show a pronounced S-phase delay in Xpa(-/-) and Xpc(-/-) ES cells, which might well function as a safeguard mechanism for heavily damaged ES cells in case the apoptotic response fails. Although Xpa(-/-) and Xpc(-/-) ES cells are totally NER-defective or GG-NER-deficient respectively, mutation induction upon UV is similar compared to wild type ES cells indicating that the observed apoptotic and cell cycle responses are indeed sufficient to protect against proliferation of damaged cells. In conclusion, we show a double safeguard mechanism in ES cells against NER-type of damages, which mainly relies on damage detection in the global genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18634906     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  32 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage response.

Authors:  Giuseppina Giglia-Mari; Angelika Zotter; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Ronin influences the DNA damage response in pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Bryce A Seifert; Marion Dejosez; Thomas P Zwaka
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.020

3.  Nucleotide excision repair capacity increases during differentiation of human embryonic carcinoma cells into neurons and muscle cells.

Authors:  Wentao Li; Wenjie Liu; Ayano Kakoki; Rujin Wang; Ogun Adebali; Yuchao Jiang; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Functional and mechanistic studies of XPC DNA-repair complex as transcriptional coactivator in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Claudia Cattoglio; Elisa T Zhang; Ivan Grubisic; Kunitoshi Chiba; Yick W Fong; Robert Tjian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  From Mfd to TRCF and Back Again-A Perspective on Bacterial Transcription-coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair.

Authors:  Alexandra M Deaconescu; Margaret M Suhanovsky
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Enhanced genetic integrity in mouse germ cells.

Authors:  Patricia Murphey; Derek J McLean; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 7.  Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing.

Authors:  Jurgen A Marteijn; Hannes Lans; Wim Vermeulen; Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 8.  The bright and the dark sides of DNA repair in stem cells.

Authors:  Guido Frosina
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-08

9.  Involvement of global genome repair, transcription coupled repair, and chromatin remodeling in UV DNA damage response changes during development.

Authors:  Hannes Lans; Jurgen A Marteijn; Björn Schumacher; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Gert Jansen; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Decreased transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair capacity is associated with increased p53- and MLH1-independent apoptosis in response to cisplatin.

Authors:  Lawton J Stubbert; Jennifer M Smith; Bruce C McKay
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.