Literature DB >> 21801029

Practical application of Sigma Metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistry.

Christian H H Schoenmakers1, Andre J M Naus, Henricus J Vermeer, Douwe van Loon, Gerard Steen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many labs have not yet selected the most appropriate Westgard Quality Control (QC) rule for each test. This is mainly due to the apparent complexity of the matter.
METHODS: From the Westgard OPSpecs Charts QC planning tool and the Sigma Metrics formula's it was deduced that every Westgard rule has its own Sigma value. This was converted to an easy three-step road map to optimal Westgard QC rules.
RESULTS: The road map provided is based on Sigma Metrics that hold a definition of "world class quality", at which no further effort to increase quality needs to be taken. Furthermore, it is shown that clinical chemical tests can be classified as "good": quality at or above world class, "bad": quality below world class but controllable with Westgard QC rules and "ugly": quality not controllable with Westgard QC rules alone. Finally, practical tips of how to deal with this and related aspects are given.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the road map based on Sigma Metrics leads to fast and easy implementation of optimal Westgard QC rules.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21801029     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Application of Sigma Metrics and Performance Comparison Between Two Biochemistry Analyser and a Blood Gas Analyser for the Determination of Electrolytes.

Authors:  Yasemin Ustundag-Budak; Kagan Huysal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Persistent lactic acidosis after chronic topical application of silver sulfadiazine in a pediatric burn patient: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Monte S Willis; Bruce A Cairns; Ashley Purdy; Andrey V Bortsov; Samuel W Jones; Shiara M Ortiz-Pujols; Tina M Schade Willis; Benny L Joyner
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-01-24

3.  Comparison between Sigma metrics in four accredited Egyptian medical laboratories in some biochemical tests: an initiative towards sigma calculation harmonization.

Authors:  Rania El Sharkawy; Sten Westgard; Ahmed M Awad; AbdelKarem Omneya I Ahmed; El Hadidi Iman; Ahmed Gaballah; Eman Shaheen
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 4.  Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories.

Authors:  Sten Westgard; Hassan Bayat; James O Westgard
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

5.  The Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Immunoassay Tests by using Six-sigma Method.

Authors:  Rukiye Nar; Dilek Iren Emekli
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Practical application of Six Sigma management in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings.

Authors:  Bingfei Zhou; Yi Wu; Hanlin He; Cunyan Li; Liming Tan; Youde Cao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Optimization and validation of patient-based real-time quality control procedure using moving average and average of normals with multi-rules for TT3, TT4, FT3, FT3, and TSH on three analyzers.

Authors:  Chao Song; Jun Zhou; Jun Xia; Deli Ye; Qian Chen; Weixing Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Comprehensive evaluation of the internal and external quality control to redefine analytical quality goals.

Authors:  Beatriz Varela; Gonzalo Pacheco
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.