| Literature DB >> 21800225 |
Femke A Mauritz1, Maud Y A van Herwaarden-Lindeboom, Wouter Stomp, Sander Zwaveling, Katelijn Fischer, Roderick H J Houwen, Peter D Siersema, David C van der Zee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antireflux surgery (ARS) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequently performed major operations in children. Many studies have described the results of ARS in children, however, with a wide difference in outcome. This study aims to systematically review the efficacy of pediatric ARS and its effects on gastroesophageal function, as measured by gastroesophageal function tests. This is the first systematic review comprising only prospective, longitudinal studies, minimizing the risk of bias.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21800225 PMCID: PMC3179590 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1644-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gastrointest Surg ISSN: 1091-255X Impact factor: 3.452
Fig. 1Flow chart illustrating details of selection of studies on results of anti-reflux surgery in children
Details on included prospective clinical trials on ARS in children
| Study (year) | Period | Method |
| Follow-up (months) | Patient characteristics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comorbidity | Age: mean or range (years) | |||||
| Capito (2008) | 1992–2003 | LNF | 127 | 66 | All | 0.25–20 |
| Cheung (2006) | 1999–2004 | ONF + G | 9 | 36–60 | Only NI | 8.5 (SD 3.5) |
| LNF + G | 11 | |||||
| Durante (2007) | 2003–2004 | ONF ± G | 7 | 3 | Only NI | 0.33–12.25 |
| VGP ± G | 7 | |||||
| Engelmann (2010) | 2001–2006 | LThF | 76 | 6 | All | 7 (SD 6.1) |
| Estevão-Costa (2010) | NR | ONF | 20 | 6–12 | All | NR |
| LNF | 5 | |||||
| Boix–Ochoa | 4 | |||||
| Kawahara (1998) | 1996–1997 | NF + Stamm | 7 | 1–3 | All | |
| Kawahara (2000) | 1998–1999 | LNF | 12 | 1–2 | All | 0.5–13 |
| Kubiak (2010) | 1998–2007 | LNF | 89 | 1.5 | All | 5.2 (SD 4.7) |
| LTouF | 86 | |||||
| Mattioli (2002) | 1998–2002 | LNF | 254 | 6–54 | All | 4.8 (0.025–14) |
| LTouF | 5 | |||||
| LThF/LJ | 29/10 | |||||
| Mattioli (2002) | 1993–2000 | ONF | 17 | 6 | No NI | 5 (SD 6.3) |
| LNF | 49 | |||||
| Menon (2002) | 1993–1999 | LNF | 11 | 12 | No NI | 9–15 |
| LTouF | 1 | |||||
| Mousa (2006) | NR | ONF | 6 | 3–7 | All | 0.5–18 |
| LNF | 7 | |||||
| Soyer (2007) | 2003–2004 | NF | 13 | 1–3 | All | 6.7 (SD 3.3) |
| Srivastava (2007) | 2005–2006 | O + LNF + G | 63 | 1 | Only NI | 1.8 (SD NR) |
| Van der Zee (1999) | 1993–1996 | LThF | 53 | 10 | All | NR |
| Weber (1995) | 1991–1993 | ONF | 56 | 12–36 | Only NI | 0.5–12 |
| Weber (1999) | 1990–1997 | ONF | 102 | 12–96 | No NI | 0.25–16 |
| LTouF | 154 | |||||
NF Nissen fundoplication (open or laparoscopic unknown), ONF open Nissen fundoplication, LNF laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, LThF laparoscopic Thal fundoplication, LTouF laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication, LJ Lortat Jacob, VGP vertical gastric placation, G gastrostomy, Stamm Stamm gastrostomy, EA esophageal atresia, NI neurologically impaired, All all patients, SD standard deviation, NR not recorded
Risk of bias summary
| Study (year) | Capito et al. | Cheung et al. | Durante et al. | Engelmann et al. | Estevão-Costa et al. | Kawahara et al. | Kawahara et al. | Kubiak et al. | Mattioli et al. | Mattioli et al. | Menon et al. | Mousa et al. | Soyer et al. | Srivastava et al. | Van der Zee et al. | Weber et al. | Weber et al. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomization | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Controlled | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Standardization | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| Adequate report on loss to follow-up | + | NA | NA | + | + | + | + | NA | NA | NA | NA | + | NA | − | + | − | − |
| Potential other source bias | +a | +b,c | +d | − | +e | +c | +b | +f |
NA not applicable (no lost to follow-up)
aNo power calculation, underpowered
bHigh drop-out percentage
cMale/female imbalance
dSignificant baseline imbalance in weight between the two arms
eTime horizon determines method of surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic)
fPatient assignment based on patient characteristics: Toupet Fundoplication in patients with symptoms or radiological signs of gastroesophageal dysmotility and adolescent patients and Nissen Fundoplication in patients with life-threatening symptoms or esophageal strictures
Success rate (complete resolution of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms) of ARS in children
| Study | Short-term SR (%) (FU < 6 months) | Long-term SR (%) (FU > 6 months) | Long-term SR (%) after second ARS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capito et al. | NR | 72 | 99 |
| Cheung et al. | NR | 70 | NR |
| Durante et al. | 57 | NR | NR |
| Kawahara et al. | 100 | NR | NR |
| Mattioli et al. | NR | 96.2 | NR |
| Menon et al. | 100 | NR | NR |
| Soyer et al. | 86 | NR | NR |
| Van der Zee et al. | 75 | NR | NR |
| Weber et al. | 79 | NR | NR |
| Weber et al. | 93 | NR | NR |
SR Success rate, FU follow-up, NR not recorded
Studies reporting reflux indices pre- and postoperatively in children
| Study |
| Reflux index preoperatively (%) | Reflux index postoperatively (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheung et al. | 20 (NI) | 5.7 | 0.15 | 0.009 |
| Durante et al. | 7 (Nissen) | 14.8 | 4.3 | 0.002 |
| 7 (VGP) | 25.7 | 12.1 | 0.042 | |
| Kawahara et al. | 10 | 15 | 0 | NR |
| Soyer et al. | 13 | 24.7 | 0.9 | <0.05 |
NI Neurologically impaired, VGP vertical gastric placation, NR not recorded