Literature DB >> 21797930

Pharmacological rationale for the treatment of chronic urticaria with second-generation non-sedating antihistamines at higher-than-standard doses.

T Zuberbier1.   

Abstract

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a long-lasting and distressing condition that impairs patient quality of life (QoL) by disrupting sleep and diminishing work/school productivity. Thus treatment should not only be safe and effective but also not add to this impairment or increase risks to health or safety. Non-sedating second-generation antihistamines, with their long duration of action, pharmacodynamic properties that allow once-daily dosing and lack of drug-drug interactions and sedative effects, are the first-line symptomatic treatment option, but some patients have no adequate response to standard doses of these medications. Other therapeutic approaches to refractory urticaria have been suggested but have been limited by sparse clinical data and/or significant adverse effect profiles. Although discouraged by treatment guidelines, sedating antihistamines are frequently prescribed for nighttime use when urticaria symptoms are severe as add-on therapy to a non-sedating antihistamine. However, their pronounced effects on rapid eye movement sleep and hangover negatively impact QoL, learning and performance, and limit their use for patients in occupations that require alertness. For patients who do not respond adequately to standard doses of non-sedating second-generation antihistamines, increasing the dose of non-sedating antihistamines thus may represent the safest therapeutic approach. Given the fact that only few controlled studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of high-dose non-sedating antihistamines in CU, patient safety should be a key consideration when choosing a specific antihistamine.
© 2011 The Author. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2011 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21797930     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04185.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chronic urticaria.

Authors:  Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  [New treatment options for chronic pruritus].

Authors:  C Zeidler; B Pfleiderer; S Ständer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in the elderly.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Ventura; Nicoletta Cassano; Paolo Romita; Michelangelo Vestita; Caterina Foti; Gino Antonio Vena
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Bilastine: new insight into antihistamine treatment.

Authors:  Erminia Ridolo; Marcello Montagni; Laura Bonzano; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Giorgio Walter Canonica
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Sphingolipids: a potential molecular approach to treat allergic inflammation.

Authors:  Wai Y Sun; Claudine S Bonder
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-18

Review 6.  Updosing of Nonsedating Anti-histamines in Recalcitrant Chronic Urticaria.

Authors:  Kiran Godse; Prachi Bhattar; Sharmila Patil; Nitin Nadkarni; Manjyot Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.