INTRODUCTION: Slow HR recovery (HRR) from a graded exercise treadmill test (GXT) is a marker of impaired parasympathetic reactivation that is associated with elevated mortality. Our objective was to test whether demographic, behavioral, or CHD risk factors during young adulthood were associated with the development of slow HRR. METHODS: Participants from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study underwent symptom-limited maximal GXT using a modified Balke protocol at baseline (1985-1986) and 20-yr follow-up (2005-2006) examinations. HRR was calculated as the difference between peak HR and HR 2 min after cessation of the GXT. Slow HRR was defined as 2-min HRR <22 beats·min(-1). RESULTS: In 2730 participants who did not have slow HRR at baseline, mean ± SD HRR was 44 ± 11 beats·min(-1) at baseline and declined to 40 ± 12 beats·min(-1) in 2005-2006; slow HRR developed in 5% (n = 135) of the sample by 2005-2006. Female sex, black race, fewer years of education, obesity, cigarette smoking, higher depressive symptoms, higher fasting glucose, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and physical inactivity and low fitness were each associated with incident slow HRR. In a multivariable model, higher body mass index, larger waist, low education, fasting glucose, and current smoking remained significantly associated with incident slow HRR. Increasing body mass index (per SD higher) during follow-up and incident hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome (in the subsets of participants who were free from those conditions at baseline) were each associated with significantly elevated odds of incident slow HRR. CONCLUSIONS: On average, HRR declines with aging; however, the odds of having slow HRR in early middle age is significantly associated with traditional CHD risk factors.
INTRODUCTION: Slow HR recovery (HRR) from a graded exercise treadmill test (GXT) is a marker of impaired parasympathetic reactivation that is associated with elevated mortality. Our objective was to test whether demographic, behavioral, or CHD risk factors during young adulthood were associated with the development of slow HRR. METHODS:Participants from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study underwent symptom-limited maximal GXT using a modified Balke protocol at baseline (1985-1986) and 20-yr follow-up (2005-2006) examinations. HRR was calculated as the difference between peak HR and HR 2 min after cessation of the GXT. Slow HRR was defined as 2-min HRR <22 beats·min(-1). RESULTS: In 2730 participants who did not have slow HRR at baseline, mean ± SD HRR was 44 ± 11 beats·min(-1) at baseline and declined to 40 ± 12 beats·min(-1) in 2005-2006; slow HRR developed in 5% (n = 135) of the sample by 2005-2006. Female sex, black race, fewer years of education, obesity, cigarette smoking, higher depressive symptoms, higher fasting glucose, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and physical inactivity and low fitness were each associated with incident slow HRR. In a multivariable model, higher body mass index, larger waist, low education, fasting glucose, and current smoking remained significantly associated with incident slow HRR. Increasing body mass index (per SD higher) during follow-up and incident hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome (in the subsets of participants who were free from those conditions at baseline) were each associated with significantly elevated odds of incident slow HRR. CONCLUSIONS: On average, HRR declines with aging; however, the odds of having slow HRR in early middle age is significantly associated with traditional CHD risk factors.
Authors: K Shetler; R Marcus; V F Froelicher; S Vora; D Kalisetti; M Prakash; D Do; J Myers Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mercedes R Carnethon; David R Jacobs; Stephen Sidney; Barbara Sternfeld; Samuel S Gidding; Christiana Shoushtari; Kiang Liu Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Sanjat Kanjilal; Edward W Gregg; Yiling J Cheng; Ping Zhang; David E Nelson; George Mensah; Gloria L A Beckles Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-11-27
Authors: Kirsten L Rennie; Harry Hemingway; Meena Kumari; Eric Brunner; Marek Malik; Michael Marmot Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Anthony M Alvarado; Kendra M Ward; Devin S Muntz; Alexis A Thompson; Mark Rodeghier; Bo Fernhall; Robert I Liem Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: N M Pimenta; H Santa-Clara; H Cortez-Pinto; J Silva-Nunes; M da Lapa Rosado; P J Sousa; R Calé; X Melo; L B Sardinha; B Fernhall Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Victor R Neves; Antti M Kiviniemi; Arto J Hautala; Jaana Karjalainen; Olli-Pekka Piira; Aparecida M Catai; Timo H Mäkikallio; Heikki Veli Huikuri; Mikko P Tulppo Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Hugo Njemanze; Charlotte Warren; Christopher Eggett; Guy A MacGowan; Matthew G D Bates; Mario Siervo; Srdjan Ivkovic; Michael I Trenell; Djordje G Jakovljevic Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-11-22
Authors: Kristin Haraldsdottir; Andrew M Watson; Kara N Goss; Arij G Beshish; David F Pegelow; Mari Palta; Laura H Tetri; Gregory P Barton; Melissa D Brix; Ryan M Centanni; Marlowe W Eldridge Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2018-03
Authors: Nóra Sydó; Tibor Sydó; Karina A Gonzalez Carta; Nasir Hussain; Shausha Farooq; Joseph G Murphy; Béla Merkely; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Thomas G Allison Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 5.501