Literature DB >> 33828473

A Socially Assistive Robot for Long-Term Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Real World.

Nathalia Céspedes1, Bahar Irfan2, Emmanuel Senft2,3, Carlos A Cifuentes1, Luisa F Gutierrez4, Mónica Rincon-Roncancio4, Tony Belpaeme2,5, Marcela Múnera1.   

Abstract

What are the benefits of using a socially assistive robot for long-term cardiac rehabilitation? To answer this question we designed and conducted a real-world long-term study, in collaboration with medical specialists, at the Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología clinic (Bogotá, Colombia) lasting 2.5 years. The study took place within the context of the outpatient phase of patients' cardiac rehabilitation programme and aimed to compare the patients' progress and adherence in the conventional cardiac rehabilitation programme (control condition) against rehabilitation supported by a fully autonomous socially assistive robot which continuously monitored the patients during exercise to provide immediate feedback and motivation based on sensory measures (robot condition). The explicit aim of the social robot is to improve patient motivation and increase adherence to the programme to ensure a complete recovery. We recruited 15 patients per condition. The cardiac rehabilitation programme was designed to last 36 sessions (18 weeks) per patient. The findings suggest that robot increases adherence (by 13.3%) and leads to faster completion of the programme. In addition, the patients assisted by the robot had more rapid improvement in their recovery heart rate, better physical activity performance and a higher improvement in cardiovascular functioning, which indicate a successful cardiac rehabilitation programme performance. Moreover, the medical staff and the patients acknowledged that the robot improved the patient motivation and adherence to the programme, supporting its potential in addressing the major challenges in rehabilitation programmes.
Copyright © 2021 Céspedes, Irfan, Senft, Cifuentes, Gutierrez, Rincon-Roncancio, Belpaeme and Múnera.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac rehabilitation; human-robot interaction; human-robot interface; long-term interaction; social assistive robotics; social robot

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828473      PMCID: PMC8020889          DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.633248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurorobot        ISSN: 1662-5218            Impact factor:   2.650


  35 in total

1.  A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs.

Authors:  H J Keselman; Rand R Wilcox; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Adherence to a cardiac rehabilitation home program model of care: a comparison to a well-established traditional on-site supervised program.

Authors:  Kerseri Scane; David Alter; Paul Oh; Dina Brooks
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.665

Review 3.  AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services.

Authors:  Randal J Thomas; Marjorie King; Karen Lui; Neil Oldridge; Ileana L Piña; John Spertus
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.081

4.  Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Combined experience of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  N B Oldridge; G H Guyatt; M E Fischer; A A Rimm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long-term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Bradley G Hammill; Lesley H Curtis; Kevin A Schulman; David J Whellan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia.

Authors:  Selma Šabanović; Casey C Bennett; Wan-Ling Chang; Lesa Huber
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2013-06

7.  Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Maja J Matarić; Jon Eriksson; David J Feil-Seifer; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Practical Guide to Enhance Patient Outcomes Through Continuity of Care.

Authors:  Catherine Giuliano; Belinda J Parmenter; Michael K Baker; Braden L Mitchell; Andrew D Williams; Katie Lyndon; Tarryn Mair; Andrew Maiorana; Neil A Smart; Itamar Levinger
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-12

9.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Availability and Density around the Globe.

Authors:  Karam Turk-Adawi; Marta Supervia; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Ella Pesah; Rongjing Ding; Raquel R Britto; Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens; Wayne Derman; Ana Abreu; Abraham S Babu; Claudia Anchique Santos; Seng Khiong Jong; Lucky Cuenza; Tee Joo Yeo; Dawn Scantlebury; Karl Andersen; Graciela Gonzalez; Vojislav Giga; Dusko Vulic; Eleonora Vataman; Jacqueline Cliff; Evangelia Kouidi; Ilker Yagci; Chul Kim; Briseida Benaim; Eduardo Rivas Estany; Rosalia Fernandez; Basuni Radi; Dan Gaita; Attila Simon; Ssu-Yuan Chen; Brendon Roxburgh; Juan Castillo Martin; Lela Maskhulia; Gerard Burdiat; Richard Salmon; Hermes Lomelí; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Eliska Sovova; Arto Hautala; Egle Tamuleviciute-Prasciene; Marco Ambrosetti; Lis Neubeck; Elad Asher; Hareld Kemps; Zbigniew Eysymontt; Stefan Farsky; Jo Hayward; Eva Prescott; Susan Dawkes; Claudio Santibanez; Cecilia Zeballos; Bruno Pavy; Anna Kiessling; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Carolyn Baer; Randal Thomas; Dayi Hu; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-07-03

10.  Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: what keeps patients in programs?

Authors:  Karam I Turk-Adawi; Neil B Oldridge; Sergey S Tarima; William B Stason; Donald S Shepard
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  5 in total

1.  Personalised socially assistive robot for cardiac rehabilitation: Critical reflections on long-term interactions in the real world.

Authors:  Bahar Irfan; Nathalia Céspedes; Jonathan Casas; Emmanuel Senft; Luisa F Gutiérrez; Mónica Rincon-Roncancio; Carlos A Cifuentes; Tony Belpaeme; Marcela Múnera
Journal:  User Model User-adapt Interact       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.230

2.  HR1 Robot: An Assistant for Healthcare Applications.

Authors:  Valentina Vasco; Alexandre G P Antunes; Vadim Tikhanoff; Ugo Pattacini; Lorenzo Natale; Valerio Gower; Marco Maggiali
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-02-07

3.  Interaction Matters: The Effect of Touching the Social Robot PARO on Pain and Stress is Stronger When Turned ON vs. OFF.

Authors:  Nirit Geva; Netta Hermoni; Shelly Levy-Tzedek
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers.

Authors:  Ayelet Dembovski; Yael Amitai; Shelly Levy-Tzedek
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 5.  A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do?

Authors:  Nan Liang; Goldie Nejat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.847

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.