BACKGROUND: Ankle injuries are the most common injury in basketball players. However, no prospective studies have been performed to determine if wearing lace-up ankle braces will reduce the incidence of ankle injuries in high school athletes. PURPOSE: This trial was undertaken to determine if lace-up ankle braces reduce the incidence and severity of acute first-time and recurrent ankle injuries sustained by high school basketball players. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 1460 male and female basketball players from 46 high schools were randomly assigned to a braced or control group. The braced group players wore lace-up ankle braces during the 2009-2010 basketball season. Athletic trainers recorded brace compliance, athlete exposures, and injuries. Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for demographic covariates), accounting for intracluster correlation, were utilized to compare time to first acute ankle injury between groups. Injury severity (days lost) was tested with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: The rate of acute ankle injury (per 1000 exposures) was 0.47 in the braced group and 1.41 in the control group (Cox hazard ratio [HR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20, 0.52; P < .001). The median severity of acute ankle injuries was similar (P = .23) in the braced (6 days) and control group (7 days). For players with a previous ankle injury, the incidence of acute ankle injury was 0.83 in the braced group and 1.79 in the control group (Cox HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17, 0.90; P = .028). For players who did not report a previous ankle injury, the incidence of acute ankle injury was 0.40 in the braced group and 1.35 in the control group (Cox HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17, 0.52, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Use of lace-up ankle braces reduced the incidence but not the severity of acute ankle injuries in male and female high school basketball athletes both with and without a previous history of an ankle injury.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Ankle injuries are the most common injury in basketball players. However, no prospective studies have been performed to determine if wearing lace-up ankle braces will reduce the incidence of ankle injuries in high school athletes. PURPOSE: This trial was undertaken to determine if lace-up ankle braces reduce the incidence and severity of acute first-time and recurrent ankle injuries sustained by high school basketball players. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 1460 male and female basketball players from 46 high schools were randomly assigned to a braced or control group. The braced group players wore lace-up ankle braces during the 2009-2010 basketball season. Athletic trainers recorded brace compliance, athlete exposures, and injuries. Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for demographic covariates), accounting for intracluster correlation, were utilized to compare time to first acute ankle injury between groups. Injury severity (days lost) was tested with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: The rate of acute ankle injury (per 1000 exposures) was 0.47 in the braced group and 1.41 in the control group (Cox hazard ratio [HR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20, 0.52; P < .001). The median severity of acute ankle injuries was similar (P = .23) in the braced (6 days) and control group (7 days). For players with a previous ankle injury, the incidence of acute ankle injury was 0.83 in the braced group and 1.79 in the control group (Cox HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17, 0.90; P = .028). For players who did not report a previous ankle injury, the incidence of acute ankle injury was 0.40 in the braced group and 1.35 in the control group (Cox HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17, 0.52, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Use of lace-up ankle braces reduced the incidence but not the severity of acute ankle injuries in male and female high school basketball athletes both with and without a previous history of an ankle injury.
Authors: Jingzhen Yang; Stephen W Marshall; J Michael Bowling; Carol W Runyan; Frederick O Mueller; Megan A Lewis Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: S B Knowles; S W Marshall; T Miller; R Spicer; J M Bowling; D Loomis; R W Millikan; J Yang; F O Mueller Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.399
Authors: Thomas W Kaminski; Jay Hertel; Ned Amendola; Carrie L Docherty; Michael G Dolan; J Ty Hopkins; Eric Nussbaum; Wendy Poppy; Doug Richie Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Lauren A Pierpoint; Shane V Caswell; Nina Walker; Andrew E Lincoln; Dustin W Currie; Sarah B Knowles; Erin B Wasserman; Thomas P Dompier; R Dawn Comstock; Stephen W Marshall; Zachary Y Kerr Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: John W OʼKane; Kristen E Gray; Marni R Levy; Moni Neradilek; Allan F Tencer; Nayak L Polissar; Melissa A Schiff Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.638