Literature DB >> 15598766

Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.

Elad Ziv1, Jeffrey Tice, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, John Shepherd, Steven Cummings, Karla Kerlikowske.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The density of breast tissue on a mammogram is a strong predictor of breast cancer risk and may reflect cumulative estrogen effect on breast tissue. Endogenous and exogenous estrogen exposure increases the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. We determined if mammographic density is associated more strongly with ER-positive breast cancer than with ER-negative breast cancer.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 44,811 participants in the San Francisco Mammography Registry of whom 701 developed invasive breast cancer. Mammographic density was measured using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system (1 = almost entirely fat, 2 = scattered fibroglandular, 3 = heterogeneously dense, 4 = extremely dense). We tested for associations between mammographic density and ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer separately. Analyses were adjusted for age, body mass index, postmenopausal hormone use, family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, parity, and race/ethnicity.
RESULTS: Mammographic density was strongly associated with both ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers. Compared with women with BI-RADS 2, women with BI-RADS 1 (lowest density) had a lower risk of ER-positive cancer [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.28; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.16-0.50] and ER-negative cancer (adjusted HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.70). Women with BI-RADS 4 (highest density) had an increased risk of ER-positive breast cancer (adjusted HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.64-3.04) and an increased risk of ER-negative breast cancer (adjusted HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.16-4.18).
CONCLUSION: Surprisingly, women with high mammographic density have an increased risk of both ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers. The association between mammographic density and breast cancer may be due to factors besides estrogen exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15598766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  48 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Lobular involution, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk: visualizing the future?

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  CD36 repression activates a multicellular stromal program shared by high mammographic density and tumor tissues.

Authors:  Rosa Anna DeFilippis; Hang Chang; Nancy Dumont; Joseph T Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Gerald V Fontenay; Hal K Berman; Mona L Gauthier; Jianxin Zhao; Donglei Hu; James J Marx; Judy A Tjoe; Elad Ziv; Maria Febbraio; Karla Kerlikowske; Bahram Parvin; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  No effect of aspirin on mammographic density in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Anne McTiernan; C Y Wang; Bess Sorensen; Liren Xiao; Diana S M Buist; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Emily White; Mary Anne Rossing; John Potter; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Risk Factors That Increase Risk of Estrogen Receptor-Positive and -Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Charlotte C Gard; Jeffrey A Tice; Elad Ziv; Steven R Cummings; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Does breast density show difference in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer measured on MRI?

Authors:  J-H Chen; F-T Hsu; H-N Shih; C-C Hsu; D Chang; K Nie; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Breast density influences tumor subtypes and tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Amanda I Phipps
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Conjugated equine estrogen influence on mammographic density in postmenopausal women in a substudy of the women's health initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne McTiernan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Christopher Martin; Jennifer David Peck; Aaron Aragaki; Etta D Pisano; C Y Wang; Karen C Johnson; Joann E Manson; Robert B Wallace; Mara Z Vitolins; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Genetic variation in the estrogen metabolic pathway and mammographic density as an intermediate phenotype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Keith Humphreys; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindström; David J Hunter; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch; Christopher G Scott; Pagona Lagiou; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study.

Authors:  A H Olsen; K Bihrmann; M-B Jensen; I Vejborg; E Lynge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.