Clemens Drenowatz1, Gregory A Hand, Michael Sagner, Robin P Shook, Stephanie Burgess, Steven N Blair. 1. 1Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; 2Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; 3European Society of Lifestyle Medicine, Paris, FRANCE; 4Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA; 5College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; and 6Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite the widely accepted benefits of exercise on chronic disease risk, controversy remains on the role of exercise in weight loss. This study examined the effect of different exercise types on measures of adiposity across different fat categories. METHODS: A total of 348 young adults (49% male; 28 ± 4 yr), participating in an ongoing observational study provided valid data over a period of 12 months. Fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM) were measured via dual x-ray absorptiometry every 3 months. Percent body fat was calculated and used to differentiate between normal-fat, "overfat," and obese participants. At each measurement time point, participants reported engagement (min·wk) in aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and other forms of exercise. RESULTS: Most participants (93%) reported some exercise participation during the observation period. Total exercise or specific exercise types did not significantly affect subsequent body mass index after adjusting for sex, ethnicity, age, and baseline values of adiposity and exercise. Resistance exercise affected LM (P < 0.01) and FM (P < 0.01), whereas aerobic exercise only affected FM (P < 0.01). Any exercise type positively affected LM in normal-fat participants (P < 0.04). In overfat and obese participants, FM was reduced with increasing resistance exercise (P ≤ 0.02) but not with aerobic exercise (P ≥ 0.09). Additionally adjusting for objectively assessed total physical activity level did not change these results. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited effects on body mass index, exercise was associated with beneficial changes in body composition. Exercise increased LM in normal-fat participants and reduced FM in overfat and obese adults. Adults with excess body fat may benefit particularly from resistance exercise.
PURPOSE: Despite the widely accepted benefits of exercise on chronic disease risk, controversy remains on the role of exercise in weight loss. This study examined the effect of different exercise types on measures of adiposity across different fat categories. METHODS: A total of 348 young adults (49% male; 28 ± 4 yr), participating in an ongoing observational study provided valid data over a period of 12 months. Fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM) were measured via dual x-ray absorptiometry every 3 months. Percent body fat was calculated and used to differentiate between normal-fat, "overfat," and obeseparticipants. At each measurement time point, participants reported engagement (min·wk) in aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and other forms of exercise. RESULTS: Most participants (93%) reported some exercise participation during the observation period. Total exercise or specific exercise types did not significantly affect subsequent body mass index after adjusting for sex, ethnicity, age, and baseline values of adiposity and exercise. Resistance exercise affected LM (P < 0.01) and FM (P < 0.01), whereas aerobic exercise only affected FM (P < 0.01). Any exercise type positively affected LM in normal-fat participants (P < 0.04). In overfat and obeseparticipants, FM was reduced with increasing resistance exercise (P ≤ 0.02) but not with aerobic exercise (P ≥ 0.09). Additionally adjusting for objectively assessed total physical activity level did not change these results. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited effects on body mass index, exercise was associated with beneficial changes in body composition. Exercise increased LM in normal-fat participants and reduced FM in overfat and obese adults. Adults with excess body fat may benefit particularly from resistance exercise.
Authors: William L Haskell; I-Min Lee; Russell R Pate; Kenneth E Powell; Steven N Blair; Barry A Franklin; Caroline A Macera; Gregory W Heath; Paul D Thompson; Adrian Bauman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Erik P Kirk; Joseph E Donnelly; Bryan K Smith; Jeff Honas; James D Lecheminant; Bruce W Bailey; Dennis J Jacobsen; Richard A Washburn Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Victoria A Catenacci; Lorraine G Ogden; Jennifer Stuht; Suzanne Phelan; Rena R Wing; James O Hill; Holly R Wyatt Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Edward Archer; Robin P Shook; Diana M Thomas; Timothy S Church; Peter T Katzmarzyk; James R Hébert; Kerry L McIver; Gregory A Hand; Carl J Lavie; Steven N Blair Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mariana C Gonçalves; Magna C F Passos; Cyntia F de Oliveira; Julio B Daleprane; Josely C Koury Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Willemijn A M van Gemert; Albertine J Schuit; Job van der Palen; Anne M May; Jolein A Iestra; Harriet Wittink; Petra H Peeters; Evelyn M Monninkhof Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Steven Mann; Alfonso Jimenez; James Steele; Sarah Domone; Matthew Wade; Chris Beedie Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 3.295