Literature DB >> 21794864

Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture.

Stéphanie Roberge1, Nils Chaillet, Amélie Boutin, Lynne Moore, Nicole Jastrow, Normand Brassard, Robert J Gauthier, Igor Hudic, Thomas D Shipp, Charlotte H E Weimar, Zlatan Fatusic, Suzanne Demers, Emmanuel Bujold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the best available evidence regarding the association between single-layer closure and uterine rupture.
METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant observational and experimental studies that included women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who had attempted a trial of labor (TOL). The risks of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence were assessed by pooled odds ratios (OR) calculated with a random effects model.
RESULTS: Nine studies including 5810 women were reviewed. Overall, the risk of uterine rupture during TOL after a single-layer closure was not significantly different from that after a double-layer closure (OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-4.44). However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk of uterine rupture was increased after a locked single-layer closure (OR 4.96; 95% CI 2.58-9.52, P<0.001) but not after an unlocked single-layer closure (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.21-1.16), compared with a double-layer closure.
CONCLUSION: Locked but not unlocked single-layer closures were associated with a higher uterine rupture risk than double-layer closure in women attempting a TOL.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21794864     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  14 in total

Review 1.  Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Ilaria Marilli; Pietro Cignini; Francesco Padula; Laura D'Emidio; Lucia Mangiafico; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Stefano Cianci; Antonio Biondi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

2.  Case Series: Spontaneous Rupture of Uterus in Early Pregnancy.

Authors:  Shashi Lata Kabra; Poonam Laul; Zeepee Godha; V K Kadam
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-02-02

3.  The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section.

Authors:  C V Hegde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-07-23

4.  The optimal uterine closure technique during cesarean.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bujold
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08

5.  Laparoscopic correction of the uterine muscle loss in the scar after a Caesarean section delivery.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Grzegorz Jakiel; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Abalos; V Addo; P Brocklehurst; M El Sheikh; B Farrell; S Gray; P Hardy; E Juszczak; J E Mathews; S Naz Masood; E Oyarzun; J Oyieke; J B Sharma; P Spark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Uterine closure in cesarean delivery: a new technique.

Authors:  Km Babu; Navneet Magon
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08

8.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.

Authors:  Guluzar Arzu Turan; Esra Bahar Gur; Sumeyra Tatar; Ayse Gokduman; Serkan Guclu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Christopher M Tarney
Journal:  Curr Womens Health Rev       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.