OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of adverse events (AEs) after tumour enucleation (TE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, clinical, surgical and functional data were prospectively gathered from 200 consecutive patients who had open TE. TE was done by blunt dissection using the natural cleavage plane between the tumour capsule and normal parenchyma. All the AEs were stratified for severity according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0 grading system. Risk factors for AEs were determined by univariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean (range) tumour size was 3.2 (0.8-10.0) cm, and mean (range) warm ischaemia time (WIT) was 16.5 (5-31) min. Overall, 32 AEs (six grade I, 20 grade II, and six grade III) occurred after TE in 30 patients and of those 27 were surgical (13.5%) and five were medical AEs (2.5%). On univariate analysis, imperative/relative surgical indication was the only predictive factor for the development of medical AEs. Statistically significant predictors of overall surgical AEs and urinary fistula were clinical tumour dimension, completely endorenal tumour growth and a positive tumour relationship with the urinary collecting system (UCS). A completely endorenal tumour growth and a positive tumour relationship with the UCS also correlated with bleeding requiring transfusions. Completely endorenal tumour growth was significantly associated with major (grade III) AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The TE technique was associated with a 16% AE rate and of those only 3% required re-intervention (grade III). Urinary fistula occurred in six patients (3%) and ureteric stenting was required in 0.5% of cases.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of adverse events (AEs) after tumour enucleation (TE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, clinical, surgical and functional data were prospectively gathered from 200 consecutive patients who had open TE. TE was done by blunt dissection using the natural cleavage plane between the tumour capsule and normal parenchyma. All the AEs were stratified for severity according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0 grading system. Risk factors for AEs were determined by univariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean (range) tumour size was 3.2 (0.8-10.0) cm, and mean (range) warm ischaemia time (WIT) was 16.5 (5-31) min. Overall, 32 AEs (six grade I, 20 grade II, and six grade III) occurred after TE in 30 patients and of those 27 were surgical (13.5%) and five were medical AEs (2.5%). On univariate analysis, imperative/relative surgical indication was the only predictive factor for the development of medical AEs. Statistically significant predictors of overall surgical AEs and urinary fistula were clinical tumour dimension, completely endorenal tumour growth and a positive tumour relationship with the urinary collecting system (UCS). A completely endorenal tumour growth and a positive tumour relationship with the UCS also correlated with bleeding requiring transfusions. Completely endorenal tumour growth was significantly associated with major (grade III) AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The TE technique was associated with a 16% AE rate and of those only 3% required re-intervention (grade III). Urinary fistula occurred in six patients (3%) and ureteric stenting was required in 0.5% of cases.
Authors: Deliu Victor Matei; Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Gennaro Musi; Giuseppe Renne; Valeria Maria Lucia Tringali; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Maurizio Delor; Andrea Russo; Antonio Cioffi; Roberto Bianchi; Gabriele Cozzi; Ettore Di Trapani; Danilo Bottero; Giovanni Cordima; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.889