Literature DB >> 21793964

Recommendations on clinical proof of efficacy for potential scar prevention and reduction therapies.

James A Bush1, D Angus McGrouther, V Leroy Young, David N Herndon, Michael T Longaker, Thomas A Mustoe, Mark W J Ferguson.   

Abstract

Cutaneous scarring is an enormous medical problem with approximately 100 million patients acquiring scars each year. Scar prevention/reduction represents a significant, and largely unmet, clinical need. Research into the prophylactic modulation of scar outcome differs from research into other disease processes as the scar is not present at the start of the study; measurements of changes from baseline are impossible. Final scar morphology is influenced by many variables. A fundamental principle that should be observed in the prospective evaluation of scar prevention/reduction therapies is that, if left untreated, wounds in treatment and control groups should have healed with identical scars. Observation of this principle will allow the detection of true treatment effects. The many variables that influence scar morphology mean that the evaluation of potential pharmaceutical products for this indication favors the use of self-controlled designs in clinical trials. In this article, we review variables that affect scar morphology and recommend the self-controlled design for clinical trials aiming to establish proof of efficacy of scar prevention and reduction pharmaceuticals. With no pharmaceutical products currently licensed for this indication, this represents a new therapeutic area. The principles discussed will also have direct relevance to the wider fields of wound healing and regenerative medicine.
© 2011 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21793964     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00607.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  10 in total

1.  Clinical Outcomes Following the Early Application of Multimodal Scar Programs for Facial Incisional Wounds.

Authors:  Joong Min Suh; Seong Hoon Park; Jun Won Lee; Seong Joo Lee; In Suck Suh; Jong Wook Lee; Hii Sun Jeong
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Cx43-Mimetic Peptide in Cutaneous Scarring.

Authors:  Christina L Grek; Jade Montgomery; Meenakshi Sharma; A Ravi; J S Rajkumar; Kurtis E Moyer; Robert G Gourdie; Gautam S Ghatnekar
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Can single use negative pressure wound therapy be an alternative method to manage keloid scarring? A preliminary report of a clinical and ultrasound/colour-power-doppler study.

Authors:  Marco Fraccalvieri; Antonino Sarno; Stefano Gasperini; Enrico Zingarelli; Raffaella Fava; Marco Salomone; Stefano Bruschi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  The IL-4/IL-13 axis in skin fibrosis and scarring: mechanistic concepts and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Julie K Nguyen; Evan Austin; Alisen Huang; Andrew Mamalis; Jared Jagdeo
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  Light emitting diode-red light for reduction of post-surgical scarring: Results from a dose-ranging, split-face, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alana Kurtti; Julie K Nguyen; Jeremy Weedon; Andrew Mamalis; Yi Lai; Natasha Masub; Amaris Geisler; Daniel M Siegel; Jared R Jagdeo
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 6.  A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring.

Authors:  G P Sidgwick; D McGeorge; A Bayat
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.017

7.  Correlation between elastic modulus and clinical severity of pathological scars: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jing Hang; Jie Chen; Weixin Zhang; Tao Yuan; Yang Xu; Bingrong Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Naringenin: A Promising Therapeutic Agent against Organ Fibrosis.

Authors:  Yanfei Du; Jun Ma; Yu Fan; Xinyu Wang; Shuzhan Zheng; Jian Feng; Jiafu Li; Zhongcai Fan; Guang Li; Qiang Ye
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  The connexin 43 carboxyl terminal mimetic peptide αCT1 prompts differentiation of a collagen scar matrix in humans resembling unwounded skin.

Authors:  Jade Montgomery; William J Richardson; Spencer Marsh; J Matthew Rhett; Francis Bustos; Katherine Degen; Gautam S Ghatnekar; Christina L Grek; L Jane Jourdan; Jeffrey W Holmes; Robert G Gourdie
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.834

Review 10.  Overview of surgical scar prevention and management.

Authors:  Daegu Son; Aram Harijan
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.153

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.