Literature DB >> 19537537

Effect of flower shape and size on foraging performance and trade-offs in a tropical hummingbird.

Ethan J Temeles1, Carolyn R Koulouris, Sarah E Sander, W John Kress.   

Abstract

Matches between the bills of hummingbirds and the flowers they visit have been interpreted as examples of coadaptation and feeding specialization. Observations of birds feeding at flowers longer or shorter than their bills combined with a lack of experimental evidence for foraging trade-offs, however, fail to support these interpretations. We addressed these inconsistencies by considering a seldom-studied dimension of hummingbird-flower relationships, the shape of bills and flowers, through experiments on the Purple-throated Carib, Eulampis jugularis, and its major food plant, Heliconia, in the eastern Caribbean. Bills of male E. jugularis are considerably shorter and straighter than bills of females. We examined foraging performances and trade-offs during visits to natural heliconias and 34 artificial flowers of differing length and curvature. Supporting predictions based on matches between bill and flower morphology, handling times of females were significantly shorter than those of males at the long, curved flowers of a green morph of H. bihai. Contrary to predictions, handling times of males were not significantly shorter than handling times of females at the short flowers of H. caribaea. At artificial flowers, maximum extraction depths of females were significantly longer than maximum extraction depths of males at all curved flowers, but not at straight flowers. Handling times of females were significantly shorter than handling times of males at the longest artificial flowers for all curvatures, whereas handling times of males were significantly shorter at short, straight, artificial flowers, but only while hover-feeding without a perch. Within each sex, handling times were inversely related to bill length at long flowers for all shapes. Taken together, these performance trade-offs suggest that the long, curved bills of females are adapted for feeding from long, curved flowers, whereas the short bills of males are adapted for hover-feeding from short, straighter flowers. In addition, the finding that differences in feeding performance occur at the extremes of floral phenotypes suggests that the evolution of bill morphology may be driven by a small subset of the flowers visited by a hummingbird species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19537537     DOI: 10.1890/08-0695.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  23 in total

1.  Exploring the nature of ecological specialization in a coral reef fish community: morphology, diet and foraging microhabitat use.

Authors:  Simon J Brandl; William D Robbins; David R Bellwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities.

Authors:  Catherine H Graham; Juan L Parra; Carsten Rahbek; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in bill size and shape of hermit hummingbirds (Phaethornithinae): a role for ecological causation.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; Jill S Miller; Joanna L Rifkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Mate choice and mate competition by a tropical hummingbird at a floral resource.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; W John Kress
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Hummingbird pollination and the diversification of angiosperms: an old and successful association in Gesneriaceae.

Authors:  Martha Liliana Serrano-Serrano; Jonathan Rolland; John L Clark; Nicolas Salamin; Mathieu Perret
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Floral specialization and angiosperm diversity: phenotypic divergence, fitness trade-offs and realized pollination accuracy.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Plant-pollinator interactions and floral convergence in two species of Heliconia from the Caribbean Islands.

Authors:  Silvana Martén-Rodríguez; W John Kress; Ethan J Temeles; Elvia Meléndez-Ackerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Shape matters: corolla curvature improves nectar discovery in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta.

Authors:  E O Campos; H D Bradshaw; T L Daniel
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.608

9.  The evolution of the traplining pollinator role in hummingbirds: specialization is not an evolutionary dead end.

Authors:  Louie M K Rombaut; Elliot J R Capp; Emma C Hughes; Zoë K Varley; Andrew P Beckerman; Natalie Cooper; Gavin H Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Pollinator recognition by a keystone tropical plant.

Authors:  Matthew G Betts; Adam S Hadley; W John Kress
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 12.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.