Literature DB >> 21792212

Physical activity pattern and activity energy expenditure in healthy pregnant and non-pregnant Swedish women.

M Löf1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Energy costs of pregnancy approximate 320  MJ in well-nourished women, but whether or not these costs may be partly covered by modifications in activity behavior is incompletely known. In healthy Swedish women: (1) to evaluate the potential of the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity (IDEEA) to assess energy expenditure during free-living conditions, (2) to assess activity pattern, walking pace and energy metabolism in pregnant women and non-pregnant controls, and (3) to assess the effect on energy expenditure caused by changes in physical activity induced by pregnancy. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: Activity pattern was assessed using the IDEEA in 18 women in gestational week 32 and in 21 non-pregnant women. Activity energy expenditure (AEE) was assessed using IDEEA, as well as using the doubly labelled water method and indirect calorimetry.
RESULTS: AEE using the IDEEA was correlated with reference estimates in both groups (r=0.4-0.5; P<0.05). Reference AEE was 0.9 MJ/24 h lower in pregnant than in non-pregnant women. Pregnant women spent 92 min/24 h more on sitting, lying, reclining and sleeping (P=0.020), 73 min/24 h less on standing (P=0.037) and 21 min/24 h less on walking and using stairs (P=0.049), and walked at a slower pace (1.1 ± 0.1 m/s versus 1.2±0.1 m/s; P=0.014) than did non-pregnant controls. The selection of less demanding activities and slower walking pace decreased energy costs by 720 kJ/24 h and 80 kJ/24 h, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Healthy moderately active Swedish women compensated for the increased energy costs of pregnancy by 0.9 MJ/24 h. The compensation was mainly achieved by selecting less demanding activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21792212     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  18 in total

Review 1.  Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Danielle Symons Downs; Emily E Pearce
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 2.  Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hans Van Remoortel; Santiago Giavedoni; Yogini Raste; Chris Burtin; Zafeiris Louvaris; Elena Gimeno-Santos; Daniel Langer; Alastair Glendenning; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Barry T Peterson; Frederick Wilson; Bridget Mann; Roberto Rabinovich; Milo A Puhan; Thierry Troosters
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Impact of Diet Quality during Pregnancy on Gestational Weight Gain and Selected Adipokines-Results of a German Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Christina Ehrhardt; Clara Deibert; Anne Flöck; Waltraut M Merz; Ulrich Gembruch; Adeline Bockler; Jörg Dötsch; Christine Joisten; Nina Ferrari
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Macronutrient Balance and Dietary Glycemic Index in Pregnancy Predict Neonatal Body Composition.

Authors:  Nathalie V Kizirian; Tania P Markovic; Roslyn Muirhead; Shannon Brodie; Sarah P Garnett; Jimmy C Y Louie; Peter Petocz; Glynis P Ross; Jennie C Brand-Miller
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Effects of dietary fat subtypes on glucose homeostasis during pregnancy in rats.

Authors:  Len H Storlien; Yan Y Lam; Ben J Wu; Linda C Tapsell; Arthur B Jenkins
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 6.  Physical activity and pregnancy: past and present evidence and future recommendations.

Authors:  Danielle Symons Downs; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Kelly R Evenson; Jenn Leiferman; SeonAe Yeo
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Physical activity energy expenditure and glucose control in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: is 30 minutes of daily exercise enough?

Authors:  Kavita Kumareswaran; Daniela Elleri; Janet M Allen; Karen Caldwell; Kate Westgate; Soren Brage; Philippa Raymond-Barker; Marianna Nodale; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Stephanie A Amiel; Roman Hovorka; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Improving ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance in pregnant women: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Julian Moeller; Roselind Lieb; Andrea H Meyer; Katharina Quack Loetscher; Bettina Krastel; Gunther Meinlschmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluations of Actiheart, IDEEA® and RT3 monitors for estimating activity energy expenditure in free-living women.

Authors:  Marie Löf; Hanna Henriksson; Elisabet Forsum
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2013-09-06

10.  Correlating mechanical work with energy consumption during gait throughout pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Krkeljas; Sarah Johanna Moss
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.