Literature DB >> 21791629

ERG status is unrelated to PSA recurrence in radically operated prostate cancer in the absence of antihormonal therapy.

Sarah Minner1, Malaika Enodien, Hüseyin Sirma, Andreas M Luebke, Antje Krohn, Pascale S Mayer, Ronald Simon, Pierre Tennstedt, Julia Müller, Laura Scholz, Jan C Brase, Alvin Y Liu, Hartmut Schlüter, Klaus Pantel, Udo Schumacher, Carsten Bokemeyer, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Guido Sauter, Thorsten Schlomm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: About 50% of prostate cancers have TMPRSS2-ERG fusions with concurrent ERG overexpression. The aim of this study was to determine whether clinical differences exist between ERG-positive and ERG-negative cancers in surgically treated patients not exposed to antihormonal therapy. A secondary aim was to search for differences between these tumor classes. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A tissue microarray containing samples from more than 2,800 prostate cancers with clinical data was analyzed for ERG alterations by immunohistochemistry and FISH. Results were compared with tumor phenotype, biochemical recurrence, and molecular features considered important for prostate cancer. The effect of ERG on androgen receptor (AR)-dependent transcription was analyzed in cell lines.
RESULTS: ERG expression was found in 52.4% of 2,805 cancers with a 95% concordance between ERG expression and ERG gene rearrangement detected by FISH. ERG expression was unrelated to clinical outcome and tumor phenotype. Differences in AMACR, Annexin A3, Bcl2, CD10, ALCAM, chromogranin A, epidermal growth factor receptor, HER2, mTOR, p53, and synaptophysin status were significant but minimal in absolute numbers. The most striking difference was found for AR expression, which was markedly higher in ERG-positive cancers. In vitro studies showed ERG-dependent impairment of AR-mediated transcriptional activity.
CONCLUSIONS: The striking similarities between these two types of prostate cancers rules out a major impact of ERG on tumor aggressiveness in early, not hormonally treated cancer. The marked difference in AR levels between ERG-positive and -negative cancers supports a systematic difference in potential response to hormonal therapy as previously observed in clinical trials. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791629     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  111 in total

1.  SPINK1 protein expression and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Richard Flavin; Andreas Pettersson; Whitney K Hendrickson; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Stephen Finn; Lauren Kunz; Gregory L Judson; Rosina Lis; Dyane Bailey; Christopher Fiore; Elizabeth Nuttall; Neil E Martin; Edward Stack; Kathryn L Penney; Jennifer R Rider; Jennifer Sinnott; Christopher Sweeney; Howard D Sesso; Katja Fall; Edward Giovannucci; Philip Kantoff; Meir Stampfer; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Targeted radiosensitization of ETS fusion-positive prostate cancer through PARP1 inhibition.

Authors:  Sumin Han; J Chad Brenner; Aaron Sabolch; Will Jackson; Corey Speers; Kari Wilder-Romans; Karen E Knudsen; Theodore S Lawrence; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Felix Y Feng
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  High alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is associated with ERG expression and with adverse clinical outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Box; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Samar A Hegazy; Bryan Donnelly; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-07

4.  The Proteogenomic Landscape of Curable Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ankit Sinha; Vincent Huang; Julie Livingstone; Jenny Wang; Natalie S Fox; Natalie Kurganovs; Vladimir Ignatchenko; Katharina Fritsch; Nilgun Donmez; Lawrence E Heisler; Yu-Jia Shiah; Cindy Q Yao; Javier A Alfaro; Stas Volik; Anna Lapuk; Michael Fraser; Ken Kron; Alex Murison; Mathieu Lupien; Cenk Sahinalp; Colin C Collins; Bernard Tetu; Mehdi Masoomian; David M Berman; Theodorus van der Kwast; Robert G Bristow; Thomas Kislinger; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 5.  The ETS family of oncogenic transcription factors in solid tumours.

Authors:  Gina M Sizemore; Jason R Pitarresi; Subhasree Balakrishnan; Michael C Ostrowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  R G Bristow; A Berlin; A Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Loss of PTEN expression in ERG-negative prostate cancer predicts secondary therapies and leads to shorter disease-specific survival time after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kanerva Lahdensuo; Andrew Erickson; Irena Saarinen; Heikki Seikkula; Johan Lundin; Mikael Lundin; Stig Nordling; Anna Bützow; Hanna Vasarainen; Peter J Boström; Pekka Taimen; Antti Rannikko; Tuomas Mirtti
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  ERG rearrangement and protein expression in the progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  J R Gsponer; M Braun; V J Scheble; T Zellweger; A Bachmann; S Perner; T Vlajnic; M Srivastava; S H Tan; A Dobi; I A Sesterhenn; S Srivastava; L Bubendorf; C Ruiz
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 9.  Androgen receptor and prostate cancer stem cells: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Qu Deng; Dean G Tang
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  p16 upregulation is linked to poor prognosis in ERG negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Burdelski; Tatsiana Dieckmann; Asmus Heumann; Claudia Hube-Magg; Martina Kluth; Burkhard Beyer; Thomas Steuber; Raisa Pompe; Markus Graefen; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Christina Koop; Jakob Izbicki; Guido Sauter; Till Krech; Thorsten Schlomm; Waldemar Wilczak; Patrick Lebok
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.