Literature DB >> 21791626

Comparison of clinical results of anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee with or without popliteal tendon reconstruction.

Kyoung Ho Yoon1, Jung Hwan Lee, Dae Kyung Bae, Sang Jun Song, Kee Yun Chung, Yang Woo Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether popliteal tendon reconstruction is necessary in anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction, although the tendon has function in the varus and rotatory stability of the knee joint. HYPOTHESIS: Anatomic reconstructions of the posterolateral corner with the popliteal tendon reconstructed will present better clinical and radiographic results than cases with the popliteal tendon not reconstructed. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 32 cases of anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. There were 17 cases of anatomic reconstruction with popliteal tendon reconstruction and 15 cases without popliteal tendon reconstruction. The authors compared preoperative and postoperative range of motion, varus instability by varus stress test, lateral joint opening on varus stress radiographs, posterolateral rotatory instability by dial test, Tegner activity score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form and knee examination form between the 2 groups. They also compared posterior translation on posterior stress radiographs in cases with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
RESULTS: There was no difference in range of motion, varus stress test, dial test, Tegner score, Lysholm score, or the score by IKDC subjective knee evaluation form. The side-to-side difference in lateral joint opening on the varus stress radiographs significantly improved after anatomic reconstruction in both groups (P < .001, P = .001), but there was no preoperative or postoperative differences between the groups. No difference was found in the grade distribution on the IKDC examination form. In the cases with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there was also no difference in posterior translation between the groups on posterior stress radiographs at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSION: No effect of popliteal tendon reconstruction was found in anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction on the stability and clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791626     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511415656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

1.  Posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency results in a reverse pivot shift.

Authors:  Frank A Petrigliano; Clayton G Lane; Eduardo M Suero; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Morphology of the fibular insertion of the posterolateral corner and biceps femoris tendon.

Authors:  Hirotaka Takahashi; Goro Tajima; Shuhei Kikuchi; Jun Yan; Yoichi Kamei; Moritaka Maruyama; Atsushi Sugawara; Takaaki Saigo; Minoru Doita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction of the Knee Using Gracilis Autograft and Biceps Femoris.

Authors:  Shanaka Senevirathna; Bruno Stragier; Guido Geutjens
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  Clinical and radiological long-term outcome after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and nonanatomical popliteus bypass.

Authors:  Tom Adler; Niklaus F Friederich; Felix Amsler; Werner Müller; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Thomas W Hash
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Elongation Patterns of Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Techniques: Results Using 3-Dimensional Weightbearing Computed Tomography Simulation.

Authors:  Sandro Hodel; Julian Hasler; Philipp Fürnstahl; Sandro F Fucentese; Lazaros Vlachopoulos
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 7.  Current Concepts of Posterolateral Corner Injuries of the Knee.

Authors:  Oog-Jin Shon; Jae-Woo Park; Beum-Jung Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  A Biomechanical Comparison of the Arciero and LaPrade Reconstruction for Posterolateral Corner Knee Injuries.

Authors:  Gehron P Treme; Christina Salas; Gabriel Ortiz; George Keith Gill; Paul J Johnson; Heather Menzer; Dustin L Richter; Fares Qeadan; Daniel C Wascher; Robert C Schenck
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-04-15

9.  Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner After Sequential Sectioning Restores Knee Kinematics.

Authors:  Stephane Plaweski; Baptiste Belvisi; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.