Literature DB >> 25228007

Clinical and radiological long-term outcome after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and nonanatomical popliteus bypass.

Tom Adler1, Niklaus F Friederich, Felix Amsler, Werner Müller, Michael T Hirschmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse the long-term outcome of patients treated for combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterolateral corner injuries by combined PCL reconstruction and popliteus bypass according to Mueller or refixation of the popliteus tendon.
METHODS: Sixteen patients treated by combined PCL reconstruction and popliteus bypass according to Mueller (n = 7) or refixation of the popliteus tendon (n = 9) were included. A mean follow-up of 24 ± three years was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000, Lysholm, Tegner and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) scores. Bilateral stress radiographs were performed. The degree of osteoarthritis was assessed using Kellgren Lawrence score. Pearson correlations of predictive factors for worse outcome were performed (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Categorically, total IKDC 2000 was B (nearly normal) in five (31%), C (abnormal) in seven (44%) and D (severely abnormal) in four (25%) patients. Lysholm score was 68 ± 22; KOOS symptom score was 40 ± 13, KOOS pain 26 ± 24, KOOS activity 18 ± 18, KOOS sport 51 ± 32 and KOOS LQ 44 ± 26. Median Tegner score decreased from pre-injury 7 (range 4-10) to 4 (range 2-10) at follow-up. Kellgren Lawrence score showed minimal osteoarthritis in seven (44%), moderate osteoarthritis in seven (44%) and severe osteoarthritis in one (12%) patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The challenging group of patients treated by PCL reconstruction and popliteus bypass according to Mueller et al. or popliteus refixation showed only moderate clinical and radiological long-term outcome without statistical difference, even if patient age at surgery and the long-term follow-up is acknowledged. Anatomical posterolateral corner reconstruction techniques should be preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25228007     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2515-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

1.  The effect of injury to the posterolateral structures of the knee on force in a posterior cruciate ligament graft: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Carter Muench; Fred Wentorf; Jack L Lewis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Steinar Johansen; Fred A Wentorf; Lars Engebretsen; Justin L Esterberg; Andy Tso
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Clinical comparison of conventional and remnant-preserving transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with posterolateral corner reconstruction.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Sung-Hwan Kim; Yong-Min Chun; Byoung-Yoon Hwang; Duck-Hyun Choi; Ji-Young Yoon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner of the knee.

Authors:  A A Malone; G S E Dowd; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 5.  The posterior cruciate ligament: a review.

Authors:  Z A Duri; P M Aichroth; P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  1997

6.  Posterior instability of the knee near extension. A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; R P Jakob
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

7.  The effects of sectioning of the posterior cruciate ligament and the posterolateral complex on the articular contact pressures within the knee.

Authors:  M J Skyhar; R F Warren; G J Ortiz; E Schwartz; J C Otis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The posterolateral corner of the knee: repair versus reconstruction.

Authors:  James P Stannard; Stephen L Brown; Rory C Farris; Gerald McGwin; David A Volgas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  [Diagnostic and incidence of the rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  P Hochstein; T Schmickal; P A Grützner; A Wentzensen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel E Cooper; Donna Stewart
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prospective analysis using a patient-based health-related scale shows lower functional scores after posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions as compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee.

Authors:  Satoshi Ochiai; Tetsuo Hagino; Shinya Senga; Takashi Yamashita; Takashi Ando; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The predictive effect of anatomic femoral and tibial graft tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on functional and radiological outcome.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Doris Hierzer; Alessa Krawinkel; Thomas Hoffelner; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.