PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of corneal dystrophies. METHODS: Records of almost 8 million enrollees in a national managed-care network throughout the United States who had an eye care visit in 2001 to 2009 were searched for a recording of corneal dystrophy on a claim submitted by an ophthalmologist or optometrist from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2007. RESULTS: Unique individuals (n = 27,372) received two or more diagnoses of any type of corneal dystrophy, for an overall corneal dystrophy prevalence rate of 897 per million (10⁶) covered lives. Endothelial and anterior corneal dystrophies accounted for most of the reported dystrophies, and granular corneal dystrophy was the least common, being reported in 167 enrollees. Age, sex, and race variations among the various corneal dystrophies were observed. The mean age of those with macular corneal dystrophy (47.3 years) was 15 years younger than the age of those with endothelial dystrophy (62.9 years), and females were most highly represented (68.5%) among those with lattice corneal dystrophy. Hispanics and blacks were underrepresented relative to enrollees undergoing eye care for reasons other than corneal dystrophy. Keratoplasty was most frequently coded among those with lattice dystrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Although caveats must be considered in using claims data to estimate prevalence in a population, these data provide an indication of corneal dystrophy's prevalence within insured subjects across the United States. Variations in age, sex, and race, within and between the different types of corneal dystrophies, raise questions that warrant further study.
PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of corneal dystrophies. METHODS: Records of almost 8 million enrollees in a national managed-care network throughout the United States who had an eye care visit in 2001 to 2009 were searched for a recording of corneal dystrophy on a claim submitted by an ophthalmologist or optometrist from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2007. RESULTS: Unique individuals (n = 27,372) received two or more diagnoses of any type of corneal dystrophy, for an overall corneal dystrophy prevalence rate of 897 per million (10⁶) covered lives. Endothelial and anterior corneal dystrophies accounted for most of the reported dystrophies, and granular corneal dystrophy was the least common, being reported in 167 enrollees. Age, sex, and race variations among the various corneal dystrophies were observed. The mean age of those with macular corneal dystrophy (47.3 years) was 15 years younger than the age of those with endothelial dystrophy (62.9 years), and females were most highly represented (68.5%) among those with lattice corneal dystrophy. Hispanics and blacks were underrepresented relative to enrollees undergoing eye care for reasons other than corneal dystrophy. Keratoplasty was most frequently coded among those with lattice dystrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Although caveats must be considered in using claims data to estimate prevalence in a population, these data provide an indication of corneal dystrophy's prevalence within insured subjects across the United States. Variations in age, sex, and race, within and between the different types of corneal dystrophies, raise questions that warrant further study.
Authors: Rhian Gwilliam; Petra Liskova; Martin Filipec; Stanislav Kmoch; Katerina Jirsova; Elizabeth J Huckle; Catherine L Stables; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Alison J Hardcastle; Panos Deloukas; Neil D Ebenezer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Keith H Baratz; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Euijung Ryu; William L Brown; Kari Branham; Wei Chen; Khoa D Tran; Katharina E Schmid-Kubista; John R Heckenlively; Anand Swaroop; Goncalo Abecasis; Kent R Bailey; Albert O Edwards Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jayne S Weiss; H U Møller; Walter Lisch; Shigeru Kinoshita; Anthony J Aldave; Michael W Belin; Tero Kivelä; Massimo Busin; Francis L Munier; Berthold Seitz; John Sutphin; Cecilie Bredrup; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Rapuano; Gabriel Van Rij; Eung Kweon Kim; Gordon K Klintworth Journal: Cornea Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Maria A Woodward; Nita G Valikodath; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Leslie M Niziol; David C Musch; Paul P Lee Journal: Eye Contact Lens Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.018
Authors: Vladimir Lamm; Hidetaka Hara; Alex Mammen; Deepinder Dhaliwal; David K C Cooper Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Nicholas S Reed; Jennifer A Deal; Matthew G Huddle; Joshua F Betz; Bethany E Bailey; Elyse J McGlumphy; Allen O Eghrari; S Amer Riazuddin; Frank R Lin; John D Gottsch Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 2.297